Ideas occur to us very often and they seem harmless enough. How can they help cause cancer? When do ideas becomes a problem? The answer is when ideas erroneously become beliefs. Ideas that have meaning become beliefs when they are attributed with significance and upheld with a great deal of confidence. We tend to think of and define meaning, firstly as what is meant by a word, text or concept and secondly as what is significant. The first definition is not true. We construct words to assign to meanings. We don’t generate meaning. Meaning requires specificity, but we can under some conditions mistakenly attribute or select meaning. We can draw a meaning out of the universal set of meanings that exist in The Mind of the Universal Observer or God. The second definition is highly relevant. Significance is the value given to a meaning. The selection brings that meaning out of obscurity but it takes significance to merit attention. With significance a belief can affect the body. You can observe that easily. If you imagine you are sitting near a fire, you are selecting a meaning of warmth. If you then place a great deal of significance on the idea of a fire warming you, you can become warm even though you might be in a cold place. If you imagine you are sitting in a slope of ice and snow then you have selected a meaning of coldness and by giving it significance you can affect your body enough to cool down even in a hot climate. In both cases it is respiration and the body’s metabolic processes that are affected. So the body can be affected by and responds to an imagined idea that is selected and given significance.
Beliefs are critical as to how a person thinks and reacts or responds to life. So where an idea might cause a transient reaction, a belief affects how the body functions over the long term. A selected meaning wrongly attributed to a general suggestion, which is then given significance and upheld with confidence can have a very detrimental effect in the body. This is exactly the case in the foul game play affecting an unsuspecting person as I described in the case I mentioned in an earlier post of unnecessary immune system response causing inflammation of the skin under a ring. It is important to recognize that the person’s own will and power is used in such a situation.
If we take the example of hypnosis, where another person is suggesting the idea, we find that it is still the individual that makes the select ideas have significance. This is evident in that some people cannot be hypnotized. They have not attributed significance to the suggestions made. The person who can be hypnotized has attributed significance to the ideas suggested by the hypnotist. It is not the hypnotist who upholds significance because if it was, then all people would or would not be hypnotized. If some can and some can’t then the choice of upholding an idea as significant is the individual’s and no one else’s. One person cannot normally exercise their will over another but there is an exception and the exception is seen in the difference between a mental attack and counter attack.
In a mental attack the attacker does not have power. He or she will look to deceive the party they want to attack, to cause them to mistakenly attribute significance and thereby use the power of the person targeted to essentially harm him or herself. The person targeted or under attack however does hold power over the attacker and this is a key part that needs to be included in the mental prescription / prayer. The person targeted has a right to defend themselves and their loved ones and property. And furthermore there is a debt created. A debt is created even in the intent to attack another person. The counter attack is done by using either a new selection or the suggestion that the attacker had made in reverse. The suggestion of the attacker or would be attacker is attributed with meaning that is levelled against the attacker or would be attacker. And I should say here that the idea of “forgiving the attacker or would be attacker breaks the contact” instead of using the debt to defend oneself is rubbish. As I will discuss later forgiveness in this case is extremely dangerous because it may wipe away the debt, which means it leaves the victim defenceless. I have found that those who advocate forgiveness in such cases are themselves wolves in sheep’s clothing and some of them are even horned demons preaching from the pulpits or evangelizing on television. Their aim is to disable the victims while giving an advantage to the toxic offenders and look good in the process.
So how does this apply in the case of cancer?
Evil people use mental attacks to do “evil work” and cancer is one of the many types of evil work. Evil is not supported by the universe as it runs contra to free will, so evil people present the person targeted with a general suggestion or idea and then try to manipulate meaning. To do this evil people need to use deception or intimidation or both and work in mobs. So for instance a person may see a scene going on outside their house where a neighbour’s workers are bulldozing on part of their property. They may perceive an idea as they see the scene. The idea seems to be describing what they are seeing but it is really mentally presented to them by someone that is trivially related to them and on the scene though appearing to be uninvolved or someone unseen who is strongly related to them. AND it is always presented under some concealed threat or danger so that the person perceiving the scene is emotionally charged and in a state of fear.
In the illustration above the idea “cutting across the front of it” is general. It describes the action seen but the words used are not specific. People don’t think and talk in specifics generally. As I mentioned above people commonly use general suggestions or descriptions in everyday conversation, writing and thinking. General suggestions are truly meaningless and of no significance. And people need to be mindful that they are meaningless because they can be used in foul play against an unsuspecting person. Meaning requires specificity but an unsuspecting person will treat the idea as having meaning if they have seen something that the words describe. This is dangerous because they may be persuaded to also attribute significance to the words. The person escapes the trap when they appreciate that the words only have significance with respect to the action of the bulldozer and nothing else. Giving general suggestion significance can be dangerous, although this is still not enough to push a person to uphold beliefs that do harm to their body.
Another example is the quizzical look or a worried look and the idea of “what’s that about?” or “what’s he worried about?”
The idea was not something she thought, even thought she may have ordinarily thought something like this. In foul play evil people leave no room for chance in this way. They present the idea so that the person thinks it’s their own thinking when it is really only a perception. And to present such an idea, usually someone related to the victim has to be involved in the background somehow. They don’t even need to be in the same location but they do need to be passed information as to what exactly the targeted person is doing. It is useless to make a suggestion addressing them at random. And again the idea is accompanied by danger so that they are emotionally charged with fear. If the danger is very obscure then they will not recognize their bodily reactivity is fear. The idea will be remembered if it is perceived under fear conditions.
I will give a third example here too. An interaction with others, especially on that is distasteful may also be used as a general suggestion and sold as belief. The suggestion that can be made here is “ramming it down her throat” and she will give it significance.
However the phrase is general. The words “ramming it down my throat” will appear as her own thinking that describes an interaction with customers at her place of work, who are demanding and intimidating. However the words themselves are a general suggestion. If she has a very bad experience then the words have significance but if she perceives them later and does not realize how they are used then she may continue to treat them as significant and therein lays the problem. Knowing how the foul play is done helps the person escape harm.
In the next post I will describe how general suggestions are used to cause an unsuspecting person to react as to bring about adverse conditions in the body. This involves the personal self and is contra to evolutionary biology, which considers the human to be a machine, a robot.