Science and Ethics

Science and Ethics.

Richard Dawkins, on the one hand, claims that science is not entitled to advice about morality and that doing so would be problematic. On the other hand he criticizes religion for wanting to advise on what is good and bad behavior and what is evil. There are plenty of experiments that could be done to show both beneficial and detrimental effects, especially for those in close relationships. The means of foul play can be used in scientific studies to expose the effects of bad behavior on health, as for example, strokes, heart disease, so-called “mental disorders” and cancer, which are the most common. All of these diseases are inherently ethical problem. So science can make extremely beneficial contributions to ethics. Why is it not being researched? The answer is money! When people understand what they are up against and how their unwitting reactions cause their somatic problems they are able to make themselves well. If you’re in the business of medicine this is disastrous. But, you may well protest, are you going to say that all doctors and scientists are greedy and bad? I would say no, but scientists’ and doctors’ behavior is no different from any other group of people in the community. The biomedical scientific propaganda, which claims that “scientists are all in search of the truth”, and that “doctors are the self-sacrificing heroes” is designed to lead people to reason for themselves that “therefore they must be all righteous”. And it is cunning because arriving at a conclusion by one’s self, one is likely to feel it is justified. This together with a big public relations effort made through all media about all the wonderful new medical discoveries and the technologies that make life easier, is aimed to “win the hearts and minds” of lay people. It is aimed at seeing scientists and doctors as uniformly honest and well-meaning. This is wrong. There are good and bad scientists and doctors.

I suspect only a small minority of scientists can be called righteous and their voices are drowned out. Many scientists do see ethical problems but do not speak up. Some speak in a way that won’t hurt them personally, while others concentrate on their work and don’t get involved. I strongly believe that those who claim “I hear no evil, I speak no evil” are at the very least aiding and abetting evil, if not evil themselves. However there are a lot of scientists that speak in accordance to their own interests and not in support of the truth. This is evident in the way the “scientific community” supports some areas of research while denying others and for no good reason. To stand against this is risky and a bad career move! One such subject is ESP. This is not allowed to be researched inside of relationship. The claim that experiments have to be double-blinded as standard procedure is not true. As you can see from previous posts even for drug trials double blinding only adds to the problem of determining the efficacy of a drug! And yet in the face of this they see fit to repeat experiments sometimes dozens of times or more trying to find the two that they can say are “statistically significant and better than placebo” that is required by law! This is morally wrong and yet this is no secret. In fact it is defended by “the science community”. Drugs that doctors prescribe to patients are not tested properly, which can lead to serious problems and deaths and yet scientists are claiming the method used is a “gold standard”. They certainly need to remove personal bias but double blinding presents other problems so the experimental procedure has to be address as to solve the problems. It is not!

There is no one dictating what is acceptable and what is not or what you can and cannot research. There is no funding organization, whether private or government, that says “you have to do this” or “it has to be done this way or else” etc. But there is a system and most “get the message”. I have seen how the system works with regard to those working in universities. They put in a proposal for a research grant, giving account of the work they would like to do, but if it is not of commercial interest or worse still it might threaten commercial interests, they get knocked back. The excuses given to them all sound benign, for instance “there is no more funds this year for this sort of project, try again next year”, or “we have others doing similar work” etc. They look around and see that their fellow colleagues get funded and see a formula. If you do this, you get your funds, but if you do that, you don’t. If you report your findings this way, you get published, but if you report them like that, you don’t. I have sat next to researchers in the tea room at the universities where I worked and many times overheard their conversations. Typically they would say,

“If I word it like that I won’t get the funds” or

“I want to do this work but how am I going to word it so that I get funded” etc.

When funding comes from private enterprise there is a need for their research to be “productive” or at least promising. That means it has got to enable some company to market something or lead to more research that will develop some drug or other profitable item. Science research that was done for the love of science is only 2% “productive”, which means what it produces most often is not profit-making or not profit making in the immediate future. Industry is not interested in funding research at that rate. They are prepared to donate large sums but they want a high return for their money. For instance they may fund to the tune of one billion dollars to develop a drug and that sounds like a lot of money but they look to gain tens if not hundreds of billion in return, ie between 10 to 500% interest on their money. They want drugs developed or disease explained in a way that can lead to drugs that generate huge profits and to do that they have to have scientists working for them that will “make it happen” for the drug industry. This leads to the corruption of science and in the next post I will discuss this with respect to cancer research.

The doctors and the biomedical research scientists grossly misrepresent the human condition and the true nature of disease. Certainly that helps keep the commercial wheels greased and running but it also enable a toxic people’s war and a massacre of tens of millions to go on. Evil people haughtily claim, the medical industry attitude, especially that of toxic doctors, as booty! The blame is always put on big pharma, with claims of “they drive policy” and “they bribe doctors” and so on but in reality it is not only big pharma because big pharma cannot do anything without the doctors and the biomedical research scientists. It is the doctors and the biomedical research scientists, who devise and do the research, interpret the data, describe the biological processes, publish their research, teach at universities and sell the medical story to the public. It is doctors that are paid large sums of money to promote a drug to the public. I have seen blogs rooting for pharmaceutical companies that not only do not disclose the relationship of the blogger to the commercial interests they are promoting, but often not even disclosing that they are a doctor. If you look for other work they have done on the web you eventually come to posts where they do declare they are doctors and that they are either employed as lobbyists by pharmaceutical companies, on their R&D staff, have financial interests in pharmaceutical companies or all of the above. As far as big pharma is concerned “business is business” But for the doctors and the biomedical scientists it is the burden of blame for immorality that rivals anything that can be said about religion and religious zealots.

Sure, science commenting on ethic.. is PROBLEMATIC!

Dawkins points to religious persecution and there has been bad religious persecution in human history, from ancient times until today. We in the West are quick to point at suicide bomber etc in the Islamic world but we have and are doing plenty ourselves. We only need to consider the number of people burnt at the stake and the missionaries that tortured and killed native people by the thousands. These people were killed for being practitioners of their own religion. Religious persecution is not the fault of religion, just as scientific corruption is not the fault of science. In both cases it is the fault of corrupt people and power politics. There has been harm done in many medical experiments and medical treatments. Some have been in the past, from the time that modern medicine began, but many are still being done in the present. Richard Dawkins fails to mention those. There were shocking experiments done by the Nazis during the Second World War and they were done by doctors but they are by far not alone. There have been many experiments done even in recent times which are nothing but gross maltreatment of humans and animals. I will discuss one example to make my point. And this example involves “whites” in the First World so you don’t say oh that’s just what happens in India or China or Iran or by the Taliban etc.

The Tuskegee Medical Experiment, which begun in 1932 and continued until 1972, a period of 40 years, took 600 impoverished and illiterate rural African Americans and exploited them horribly.. indeed brutalized them and their families. These people were used as subjects to study syphilis. One third did not have syphilis, while the other two thirds did but were never told that they had syphilis. They were told that they had “bad blood” and were told that they would be given free medical care. In fact they were not treated. The medicine was phoney but hardly a placebo since their doctors aimed to do deliberate harm. The aim was to study the disease through a person’s lifetime and finally n autopsy!

They were not only not treated, they were prevented from getting treatment from anywhere else. In the 1940s penicillin was approved as a drug and became the standard treatment for syphilis. The antibiotic could have been used to treat those people with the disease. After all by that time they had studied these people’s medical condition for 8 years. But these doctors did not treat the subjects and actively prevented them and their family members from seeking another diagnosis and treatment as had become available to them in the area; So the study continued and under various supervisors during its 40 year duration. So it cannot be blamed on one or two research doctors and scientists.

The study was not secret. There were reports openly published and available to the medical community throughout the study years. The medical community knew full well what was going on and no doctor said anything. In 1966 Peter Buxtun, a venereal-disease investigator with the department of Public Health Services wrote to the national director of the Division of Venereal Diseases to point out the lack of ethics and morality of the long term syphilis study. The Center for Disease Control however were the very people, who by then were in control of the study, so their reply was that there was a need to continue the research until it was completed. And completed meant all the syphilis subjects had to have died and their corpses autopsied. They sought and gained support from the local chapters of the National Medical Association and the American Medical Association. In 1968 William Jenkins, an African-American working as a statistician at Public Health Services called for an end to the study, but his call went unheeded. This syphilis study was done with the approval of doctors, and without any objections made by doctors AND from the very top to the wider community of doctors and research scientists, who knew about it because it was published opening in the medical literature. The question is why didn’t any of them speak us? Are they all bad?

In 1972 Peter Buxtun became “the whistleblower” when he leaked the study to the press, which led to the study being terminated immediately due to a public outcry. By that time most of the men with syphilis had died. But it was not the dead men alone that suffered. Their wives had contracted the disease and there were babies born with congenital syphilis. Instead of hanging their heads in shame or scrambling to apologize, arguments were made to defend the doctors. The excuses made were that people who got syphilis were to blame; that they had contacted it themselves owing to their sexual activities. So the subjects that took part in the experiment were at fault not the doctors! This reasoning was used to say that it blinded the physicians and thus justified their inaction for not treating their subjects. Who are they kidding? What about the fact that they didn’t treat the wives so infants were born with the disease? The physician’s intention was to study the long term progression of the disease and most probably also its effects on unborn children. I would say any of the wives or infants born that subsequently died would have been autopsied too. Right at the start one researcher was not in agreement with the study going beyond the first year and the patients left untreated. But he was overruled so he retired from the program. The physicians knew their subjects, they knew their subjects were married and they knew that their subjects had wives. They also knew that those wives, at various times, got pregnant and gave birth to diseased newborns. The physicians involved acted deliberately and inhumanely and could hardly be said to be blinded by the way the disease is contacted. By such reasoning doctors should not treat any one with venereal diseases ever!

Yes, this can be described as racist but even there the true motive is hidden. The harm that they did could have equally been done to anyone. Evil people, to justify themselves, commonly hide under a racist cover. You have to ask yourself, is this an experiment or a hate crime? By the end of the study only 74 of the original 399 syphilitic subjects were still alive. 28 had died of syphilis, 100 had died of related complications, 40 of their wives had been infected and 19 of their children were born with congenital syphilis. They had seen one after another die or become infected or be born infected over a 40 year period and they continued on. They continued unaffected by the suffering of innocent victims. They even unashamedly publish their results openly to the wider community of doctors. The catch cry: “Oh well they need to be professional and not get caught up in feeling sorry and human emotions!” Think about it. Do you expect that the surgeon that might operate on you should treat you like a piece of meat in order to be professional? They were only stopped when a whistleblower leaked the study to the press. Who can do such a thing? These are what their psychiatric colleagues label as “successful psychopaths” and they are doctors and medical researchers. And with their own colleagues looking on or having knowledge after the fact because the findings, at every stage, were published in scientific journals. For 40 years the scientific community was silent!

It is also not valid to blame the American people and say that they are racists. When the news was leaked to the press there was a public outcry, so great, it ended the study in a day. This shows that the racist card could not have been played. Furthermore Congress passed laws and set up a commission to regulate studies involving human participants. Medical ethics is really about laws having to be set up by governments in order to protect the public from the doctors. And laws that were well justified because in Guatemala the U.S. Public Health Service doctors did even worse things. From 1946 to 1948 American doctors infected soldiers, and patients in a mental hospital as well as prisoners with syphilis, with the cooperation of some Guatemalan health ministries and officials. A total of 696 men and women were made sick with syphilis in experiments without their informed consent. After the subjects were confirmed to have become infected with the disease they were treated with antibiotics but they may not have all been cured. And such things happen in other first world countries too and involved all people. I am old enough to recall that in Australia in the 1960s and early 1970s there was a lot of effort made by the public to gain the right to have a say in their own medical treatment over and above what the doctors wanted. In the 1950s and 1960s if you had cancer for instance, you had to undergo surgery or whatever other treatments the doctors wanted to give you. If you objected you were treated as a mentally ill patient as well. This was not about health but money.

With all the legislation that has been put into place in most countries around the world things should have gotten better but they are worse today than ever before. Health has become a very big issue. Part is seen in the government involvement in health care and corruption. There are conflicts of interests with respect to treatments and drugs they will approve or will not approve. Part of the problem is seen in the commercial interests selling and governing treatments.

The pharmaceutical companies have gained tentacles in all areas and play one against the other. For example if a pharmaceutical company doesn’t get their merchandise approved by a government body then they use their influence with patient groups and have the patients apply the pressure on governments for them. People are complaining about individual doctors and bad treatments, misdiagnoses and wrong diagnoses. They are complaining about the ill effects of some drugs. However all of this, even though it appears huge, is only the visible top of the iceberg. The big problem is the nature of disease itself and how it is being portrayed by the biomedical scientists.

We hear about how patients need drugs and doctors but we done hear too much about the fact that for doctors and drugs to exist there needs to be patients.

The doctors and the pharmaceutical companies need people to get sick and to have a need to buy treatments. Without patients the whole medical industry implodes into dust. Disease is a necessary part of the picture and yes, it has existed from ancient times. However in the last half century its incidence has sky-rocketed. We think that as there are more people on the Earth there will be more people who will, at some time in their lives, become sick. No! It is the percentage of people who get sick that is sharply increased.

How has this happened? Incredible as it might sound to you this is also about corruption. Disease, and even infectious disease, is all about how people are being underhandedly cheated and maltreated and for a variety of reason. Most commonly the offenders are those close to the victim/patient, typically next-of-kin. Their aim is to manage their lives by manipulating and controlling the other party or by punishing them “for disobedience”!

In the case of infectious disease the means is simple. It has to do with posing danger covertly and thus causing the person targeted to react with fear, which is a person’s normal reaction under conditions of danger. When a person experiences fear due to an external danger, their immune system is temporarily declined; which is a normal reaction. However when the danger is unseen and not understood by the person targeted and when the offenders continue to pose danger over a prolonged period of time, then the person’s fear reaction continues over time. This means their immune system is declined over that amount of time. A declined immune system makes the person vulnerable to infection because the means by which they have and normally use to fight infection are not in use in their body. This is particularly evident in what happened in the Congo. The white colonialist-exploiters had exercised a harsh system of punishments, such as publicly chopping off one hand in those who refused to work, to force the natives to work on their plantations. However the harsh treatment meant the natives lived in constant fear. As a result a large percentage of the population died of infectious diseases. The plantation owners then moderated their treatment of the natives, not because of any moral reason, but because they were rapidly losing their workforce. With less danger of being brutalized by the whites, the natives survived and were productive. This is one clear example that flies in the face of the medical germ theory. It is not the germs that are a problem but the wellbeing of the organism. Our bodies are designed to be able to fight pathogens that are new and that they have never encountered before and to build up immunity against those pathogen as well.

As you saw in the posts on how cancer develops, foul games are played in a way that causes the person targeted to react in a particular way so that their body develops cancer. To get the effects that an evil offender is looking for, he or she needs to be able to employ other evil people over a long period of time. So how do these toxic people find one another? The answer is that evil people are networked with like-minded others thus they can find the people they want to use easily and quickly. Being networked they can also impose a code of behavior on the evil collective. Like ordinary underworld gangs they maintain secrecy under pain of death. And the type of death that they commonly employ is white washed by a medical examiner at autopsy, i.e., heart attacks, stokes and other fatal medical conditions.

Since the industrial revolution a lot of people have moved to the cities so that in today’s world the greater number of the population live in close proximity to one another. Modern technologies, such as the internet and mobile phones etc., have given people more immediate access to one another. Both close proximity and technology has also enabled toxic people to build bigger networks and exchange a lot of information about various cheats or what they call “procedures”. Evil people have became more sophisticated in the foul games that they play. Most evil people don’t know anything about biology and they don’t have to. They only know that “if you do this, you get that reaction and that leads to this sort of medical condition or death”. As one evil man once said to me after I explained how the biology behind anxiety, “I never thought about it so deeply”.

In the last hundred years there have been many movements, such as gay rights and women’s liberation etc., that empowered people. Empowered and liberated people are a problem for toxic people. Toxic people want to enslave those with whom they form long term relationships, especially in marriage, socially and in the workplace, in order to manipulate and control them. Toxic people become more aggressive when opposed. They see a “them and us” world and they want to dominate and rule the world. To do this they have built elaborate recruitment programs to target children, both their own and those of others, in situations where they are able to gain influence or where they can create situation to gain influence. And these situation are not simply physical. Ignorance of the ways in which they operate is the biggest problem for humane people. Understanding that the battle is fought in the mental realm is what is needed to destroy evil people and their networks.

The medicos, mostly psychiatrists, talk about 2 or 3% of the population are psychopathic. And they have conveniently made a large number of artificial classifications to hide the bigger number, eg narcissistic, antisocial, etc. It takes about 5 or 6 toxic people (psychopaths = criminals), at the very least, to get one cancer patient. If we look at the disease load on the world, we can see that the figure the doctors are talking about is too low. I would say the figure is closer to 10 or 15% of the population! And if you add to that the number of people who are greedy enough to aid and abet psychopaths, then the number of harmful people in the community can be far greater than 20%. I suspect the power politics and the dirty games that are played is the reason for the many new and mysterious medical conditions and syndromes that are emerging in recent times. Evil people, though their numbers may be high, can be beaten. And really will be beaten. I will be discussing evil people and their networks in more depth in another blog. I have started to document what I know about foul games (cheats / “procedures” ), that are played here: http://kyrani99book1.wordpress.com/ and I will beadding more to this blog in the future.

The foul games that toxic /evil people play, which gain them power and influence over another person, to manipulate and control the other person, is the root cause of all the major diseases ( http://www.kyrani99.wordpress.com/ ) and maybe all disease, even those diseases that are congenital. In the last fifty years or so, especially as more is known and understood about biology, doctors and medical researchers have become aware of the real causes of disease. And of course toxic doctors today know full well why a person becomes sick. They use these methods themselves! It is not some miracle cures but the information about the true nature of disease that the biomedical industry is hiding. The cure to diseases such as cancer is information and how it can be used and not a drug or some medical procedure. When the person experiences an “ah ha” experience, their body begins to remiss the cancer etc. Their body naturally facilitates their journey back to health. This process can be greatly accelerated using mental prescriptions or what we may call well formulated prayers.

The truth about cancer and other diseases is being concealed by many means, such as discrediting of ESP and the use of the psychiatric profession to discredit the link between ideas and the biology. These means help evil people remain hidden and able to continue to play their foul games, giving the biomedical industry, which includes doctors and scientists, the ability to profit from disease. The medical industry is aiding and abetting the worst elements in society to maximize their profits.. indeed to gain profit because without disease they have no work. And diseases are increasingly “maintained”, so patients have to take medication over a long time. People are continually subjected to various tests with the treats of “it could come back” or “let’s see if it’s come back” etc. For diseases to be maintained and hence made even more profitable, the victim/patient has to be abused for many years and in some cases for the rest of their lives while doctors claim no social responsibility.

The foulest means are used to keep the truth about diseases, and specifically as I will discuss, the truth about cancer quiet. It is done by the biomedical scientists themselves and not big pharma.

Science is being corrupted… polluted in the foulest ways for the sake of power politics and profits. So while the doctors in the Tuskegee Experiment openly published their finding and no doctor raised a red flag, here the doctors are opening corrupting science and doing it collectively, with consensus and hard selling it to the public. They have depicted the biological structures and processes in ways that sell the medical stories. They aim to deceive the public. And for their efforts the research scientists and doctors gain huge grants, build large research empires and new biotech companies etc. They become the prima donnas in university departments and of course many are directly employed in R&D by the pharmaceutical companies. The pharmaceutical industry collectively has tens of thousands of scientists and doctors working for them. The commercial agenda becomes evident when we critically examine the way the biology is reported. This corruption, unlike the ESP denials and denigrations, demonstrates not only the false medical story about disease but corruption that goes a long way further. Biomedical scientists and doctors are looking to affects people’s lives and beliefs in many other areas to help their cause. So religion and faith are under attack, free will is under attack and ethics has been reduced to “what suits me so long as I can somehow justify that it doesn’t hurt others”. So it can be said: “what suits me, i.e., what profits I can make, so long as I don’t hurt anyone, but if others do the hurting and that helps me profit, who’s fault is that?” Relative Morality! To make it stick, it is not enough to deny ESP and corrupt the science, they need to take down faith and free will as well and make you a robot, a fool!

Kyrani Eade, March, 2014

Prayer testing not done honestly.

Prayer testing not done honestly.

Prayer tested scientifically using randomized double-blinded controlled trials.

There are a great variety of results from the studies of prayer and various methods used. I will discuss a selection to discuss the results they obtained.

Of the double-blinded studies, which showed a positive result for prayer, one used patients who suffered infertility and another used patients suffering from heart disease.

The prayer experiment conducted on women at an in vitro fertilization clinic was double-blinded but to an extreme in that neither the patients nor their caregivers knew about the study. The study, where no consent was given to participate, was done in Korea. Half of the women patients were randomly assigned to believers in a distant country (from the United States, Canada or Australia), who praying for them. The interceding prayer givers were given photographs of the patients. They found that the prayer had a measurable effect and a significant effect. The prayed for patients were twice as likely to become pregnant than the control patients, who had no prayers offered for them. The findings were published in the Journal of Reproductive Medicine ( September 2001 issue).

I am very sceptical of this result, even though as a theist I should be pleased. There is one big problem with it and that is you cannot intervene in another person’s life without getting consent from them first. If you could evil people would have a field day. To do evil work they go to extraordinary lengths to deceive the person targeted or to seriously intimate them before they can try to do them harm. And everything they do hinges on the person targeted believing the lies or becoming intimated sufficiently to buckle. Though a prayer is used to do good and not evil, nonetheless a person’s free will conditions apply. You cannot do anything, whether good or evil, if the person does not give consent to it. That consent, in the case of evil work is obtained through deceit, i.e., the person doesn’t realize what they are consenting to, or it is obtained by force through the use of intimidation. However in the case of good such conditions cannot be used. You might say what about the placebo that is given in clinical practice. As far as doctor are concerned they say they are deceiving the patient because they are giving the patient some substance, usually sugar or flour, which has no “active ingredient” and thus no pharmaceutical benefit. The reason they believe this is because they do not treat ideas and beliefs as having a beneficial effect as far as health is concerned because they see a material machine, a robot whose biology is driven by linked causes. Biology is not purpose driven as far as doctors are concerned. So the idea that they give the patient, i.e., that they have been given a powerful drug that will make them well, is not considered at all, let alone as the active ingredient.

However there is another even more basic reason in the case of the doctor and the patient. A patient goes to a doctor to seek advice and /or treatment for their disease. In the very action of going to a doctor they are making an investment and if they accept the doctor’s diagnosis and proposed treatment then they have already given consent before they get the placebo. And as I mentioned above, though the doctor may see it as deceit, in fact it is the idea that counts. It is the idea of getting well that is the active ingredient, so the pills that the doctor gives are merely an anchor, equivalent to the filler in a real drug. So there is no real deception, except in the doctor’s mind and only because they see sophisticated material machines sitting in front them in their rooms and not the material aspect of a spiritual being with a mind that drives the biology.

Another study, which was also double blinded and followed scientific guidelines, was conducted on a group of cardiac patients that were to undergo for angioplasty (150 patients ). This study also found that those receiving intercessory prayer, which was also without their knowledge and thus without their consent, had fewer complications than other groups. The study was published in the American Heart Journal (November 2001 issue). Only this study had a twist to it, which makes me suspicious of this one as well. The other groups that were used for comparison included groups of patients who received “complementary therapies” or in other words some of the modern medical industry’s competition. This smacks of “you’re better off with a prayer and appeal to God than you are going to the opposition”! And most people who believe in God will pray, but as well as seeking treatment, which they hope will supplement their prayers. If they perceive the supplementary treatment not as good as the prayers then they are not likely to use it.

Another study of cardiac patients, which boasted of being the LARGEST study on the subject, claimed that “prayer can actually cause more complications“! This is one of the famous prayer experiments called the Great Prayer Experiment. It was conducted by the Templeton Foundation. In the study there were about 1,800 patients in six hospitals, who had coronary artery bypass surgery. In this study patients were randomized into three groups. The first two groups, an experimental and a control group were double-blinded so the patients only knew that some would receive prayers and some wouldn’t. Those in the third group all knew they would receive prayers. In this study there was an attempt made to standardize the prayer. The prayer-givers were only given the first names and the last initial of the patients and no photographs. Three Christian churches took part and their congregations were allowed to pray for the patients their own way, but with one condition. They were asked to include the phrase, ‘for a successful surgery with a quick, healthy recovery and no complications’ in their prayers. Some of the prayer-givers complained that it was unusual for them.

This study found no difference between those patients who were prayed for and those who were not, which is after all similar to drug trials where there are people who fare well in both groups and people who do not do well in both groups. What this study did show was a difference between those who were blinded and those who were not blinded but it went in the wrong direction. Those who knew they had been prayer for suffered significantly more complications than those who did not. The experimenters explained that these patients had additional stress, which was labelled as ‘performance anxiety’. One of the researchers said that these patients may have felt uncertain or wondering “am I so sick they had to call in their prayer team?’ I find this explanation an insult to one’s intelligence. They were in a prayer trial and knew that and had agreed to take part and knew they would be prayed for. There are other reasons that can well explain these findings. I see two possible explanations.

The problem in this and indeed all studies regarding prayer is that healing is the result of “the supernatural” and even worse God, “The Supreme Supernatural Power”. The biomedical sciences have HUGE problems even hearing the words “supernatural power”. Look at the criticism coming from Richard Dawkins, whose official scientific mission is to educate the public regarding science. Little surprise he’s an atheist. The big problem that scientists have is that they cannot explain disease in a way that could make Divine Intervention in any way possible. There is complete disagreement for any ground to exist biologically, by which prayer could plausibly, reasonably be grounds for healing. The biomedical sciences are rigidly materialistic. It’s a deadlock, a situation in which no progress can be made. An as I have discovered, it is not because they don’t believe that ideas play a big role, but because ideas brings their propaganda that “diseases can only be treated by physical means” in question. So it seems the old saying “a stick in time saves nine” is considered a solution.

Here is how that “performance anxiety” can be explained

– on “medical grounds”.

The only ones that can adversely influence the patient in the hospital is the medical staff. They could create beliefs even without posing danger because what a doctor has to say carries a lot of weight. However a toxic or greedy doctor or a doctor that wants to discredit prayer can in addition pose danger. And that danger can be concealed because it is in the form of ideas that give adverse meanings to whatever is goings on. Ideas that cast doubt about what is in a syringe can be enough to frighten and thus unsettle a patient causing anxiety. With a patient in a state of fear the nasty prayer could have even more devastating effects.

Anxiety, which is a mix of fear and worry, causes opposing signals. The heart gets signals to go fast and slow at the same time. Such conditions can have an adverse affect on the heart even for a healthy person. For someone who has undergone surgery and who has a heart problem the effects of anxiety are very serious. It could lead to complications, if the anxiety is either serious enough or lasts a long time. And I would add here that in the normal course of events, in the case of complications after surgery, we need to ask serious questions as to how they come about. The doctors certainly gain financially if the patient develops complications. Are they genuine or are they manufactured?

Here is how the “performance anxiety” can be explained

– with the involvement of their “nearest and dearest”!

Heart problems are also the result of foul game play and the abuse is usually meted out as heavy handed means of gaining power and influence over the victim. A heart attack can kill more quickly than any cancer and even if the person doesn’t die, they may need many months to recover. To see the sort of foul play that leads to heart problems have a look at my main blog here: http://kyrani99.wordpress.com/2012/02/09/heart-disease-the-games-get-more-serious-deadly/ and the following few posts. If a chief offender deems that the person they are trying to gain power and influence over is not bending to their will sufficiently, then they may create further problems. The foul games require that a belief be created and that is done with the use of fear. To cause fear in the patient the toxic / criminals brought into the vicinity of the patient need to be given access. This is always done indirectly. At the time that the chief offender, most commonly a relative, visits the patient they can potentially open the door to someone else. That someone else needs to be present in the hospital, possibly with a gun and be in an area near the patient’s ward. The patient will detect the danger but as the danger is not obvious and there is no physical evidence then they will not only feel fear but worry as well. Right there is anxiety. The anxiety can last the duration of the chief offender’s visit and even longer, if the chief offender has recruited a toxic hospital staff member. So a lot of problems can be created for the patient, enough to need further surgery.

The Prayer-giver congregations in the experiment.

It would be incomplete not to say something about the prayer-givers assigned in the experiment. It is certainly not a good thing for anyone to indiscriminately give a stranger consent to pray on their behalf. And that includes everyone because there are plenty of toxic people who join religious groups, act out as the devout and use that position to hurt others. Not everyone you meet in a church or a mosque or temple etc., is good. However the prayer-givers do not have enough information with only a first name and initial and no photograph to be able to make negative suggestions that could have any effect. Furthermore there is no relationship so there is no mental entanglement and no ESP for the patient to become aware of a toxic person’s negativity, if such a person was present in the congregations of the churches. So the prayer-givers in the three churches could not have caused the patient anxiety at all, let alone enough for the patient to suffer complications.

The mentality of a toxic spouse causes them to see their plans thwarted if the patient, their victim is placed in a prayer experiment. A chief offender, who wants to make the patient suffer, is not going to be very happy about hearing that they are being prayed for. They will see this as support and something that stands in opposition to their plans. So they can be motivated to act to extend the foul play even after the person has had surgery.

The only effect a congregation of prayer givers could possibly have is a positive one and not a negative one. However for them to have a positive effect they would have to be reinforcing what the patient wants. So a patient that knows that they are being prayed for and gives consent and further to that desires for the prayers to be effective, will gain a benefit. This means that they will get better not worse. Why that happens needs further explanation about God and creation and their interaction. So I will explain that in a later post after I have discussed the necessary conditions.

While believers already appreciate the benefits and influence of prayer, too many scientists remain unconvinced or perhaps more likely unwilling to accept it. Some are committed to a materialism is all that there is point of view. But I know that there are plenty of doctors and medical researchers, who know full well that the material reality is not all that there is and who indeed know and use ESP. There is a war on religion and God and free will and the mind as anything other than being a phenomenon arising from the material brain. The reasons for the war-path taken by science and most particularly the biomedical sciences against God etc., are the big financial interests at stake, a multi-trillion dollar industry and the status and prestige of doctors and scientists, so they deny God and thus also any role for Divine Intervention. However they can only lose the war because the Truth is undying.

Problems in drug testing.

Problems in testing drugs

I will critic the methods of testing both drugs (in this post) and prayer (in the next post) because I believe that both are seriously faulty. Many experiments regarding prayer, I strongly believe, have been tampered with. In the case of the drugs there are problems with the experiments that are not due to the science but which in many cases render the science near useless.

The medical industry has been very successful in treating infectious diseases using drugs (antibiotics and vaccines) however they are facing a lot of problems when it comes to cancer. I would say that a part of the problem is that the cancer cells are not aliens in the body but only a different variety of cells. So while one can find features that are unique to various cancer cells one still has to use chemicals to try and kill them that will also harm other cells or cause problems in the body. The problem is one of how to make the treatment unique to one type of cell in the body? This is why there is a lot of research done in trying to find the differences between cancer cells and other cells on the genetic level and why personalized medicine is seen as a possible treatment. However even with personalized medicine there is still a basic problem, which is in determining the efficacy and safety of a drug. Drugs that enter the marketplace are financially successful because they are aggressively marketed, but they fail some of the patients that take them. On the other hand there may be drugs that never reach the market place and which could have helped some people. There are problems at the testing stage of drugs that may account for these problems.

Drugs are tested using randomized, double-blinded, controlled drug trial. The trials aim to compare the drugs to a blank, all other things remaining the same. This is the way of science and works well in many cases but there are three big problems that stand in the way when it comes to testing drugs used to treat disease and especially cancer.

One problem is that to test the drugs the researchers need patients. Patients and cancer patients in particular are people who are desperate. Most people believe that a cancer diagnosis is essentially a death sentence and reasonably so because the vast number do not live for more than another decade after their diagnosis. A terminally ill person will try anything, clutch at any straw, whether it is proven or unproven, real or imaginary to get well. They will take drugs that they may know are harmful to them because they see a chance at life, even if that chance is slim and even if that chance only gives them a few more years.

In a drug trial all patients know they are in an experiment testing drugs. And they know that they will be given either a drug or a blank / dummy drug that doctors call a placebo. Actually in calling the blank a placebo they create a bias because there is an idea conveyed to a patient that they might get well on what they are give and that is not what the patient should be lead to believe. However even calling it by it’s real name.. “a blank” the researchers still have a major problem. Patients who enter a trial may believe that the drug being tested is a “promising new drugs” and that it will make them well. Thus they may choose to believe that they have been given a drug, regardless of what they are given. As they are double blinded they don’t know which group they are in but they know that half will get the drug and half will not; so they have a fifty-fifty chance, a good chance in their eyes that they have been given a drug! So why not believe that they are one of the lucky ones! This means patients in both the intervention arm and the placebo arm may believe that they have been given a drug.

So the first problem is that a large number of patients, from both the “intervention arm”, i.e., those who have been given the drug, AND in the “control arm”, those who have been given the blank, may exhibit “a placebo effect”.

For good judgments to be made and disagreements properly assessed the process of science, especially in the use of statistics, needs to be objective. Experiments need to be set up so that the effects of the drugs can be assessed. However the blinded drug trial prohibits objectivity precisely because they are dealing with desperate people AND because people can choose to believe something that they deem will save their lives. It causes research scientists to end up doing many experiments, looking for the one or two experiments that show a significant difference between those that take the blank/ placebo and those that take the drug. Often that difference may only be a small percentage but enough to show a statistical significance or is it? Is this significant difference due to the drug or is it all just a placebo effect? All you need is a few more people in the intervention arm that are much more desperate than the average of the ones in the control arm to get this difference. Thus they may talk about the patients in the intervention arm doing “significantly better than the average” but in fact they cannot judge whether it was due to the drug or a placebo effect. So the researchers are left with uncertainty as to who “responded to the drug” and who exhibited a placebo effect. This means the efficacy of the drug cannot be determined.

In a single blinded trial all of the placebo effect is seen only in the intervention arm. The control patients, who were given the blank, do not show a placebo effects. The reason that is given is that the doctors might inadvertently give the patients physical cues that tell the patients whether they have a drug or not. However I doubt this would be the case unless all of the researchers either acted unethically and/or gave unconscious cues to the patients. I don’t think this is the case. The reason is that the patients become aware of what the research doctors know through relationship and ESP and this is something that the researchers deny. Even with no blinding at all there would still be a placebo effect in the drug group because it doesn’t matter what drug a doctor gives a patient, there will be at least some placebo effect. The efficacy of the drug is thus difficult, if not impossible, to determine. How to make the process of science objective? A new method needs to be found but the second problem stands in the way and it is an even bigger obstacle.

The second problem has to do with the cause of cancer. If it was due to the physical causes that the doctors consider then this problem disappears but the causes are not physical. Ideas and how a person reacts somatically to those ideas are the problem. When ideas are upheld in mind as beliefs they become the critical factor that causes the person to react and that reaction is physical. This means toxic people and foul play are involved. Ideas by themselves are lame. Psychiatrists try to make a case

that the ideas and the issues, especially of the past are responsible for troubling a person. This is rubbish. It is equivalent to blaming the words of a person’s language for that person’s distress and not admitting to the bully that said them.

If the cancer patient enters a drug trial or begins therapy then the chief offender gains an opportunity to further deceive the person they are abusing. There is no better way for a toxic chief offender, whose aim is to gain heavy handed power and influence over the person they stress, to convince their victim that they were really sick, than to have them believe the drugs had made them well. All they need to do is back off once the patient enters a drug trial. And of course the offender may play the role of the supportive friend, relative or spouse etc., who is standing by them during their illness. It just adds a guilt and / or obligation factor into the game. Many women with cancer marry the boyfriend that stood by them after cancer treatment or even during cancer treatment and often because they feel obligated. They don’t realize that the boyfriend may be the very reason they got cancer. And she won’t realize because the public is conditioned to believe in physical causes and genetic mistakes. How could he possibly be responsible for her having cancer? It seems inconceivable but to make sure she doesn’t start putting two and two together she would be surrounded by people that he has chosen to reinforce the medical view.

If the foul play stops then the cancer stops growing and the body begins the clean up process. So during their participation in the drug trial, whether taking the drug or not, they will have what is know as “a spontaneous remission” but of course neither the patient nor the doctors know this. If they are part of the intervention arm then the researchers will consider the drug worked. If they are in the placebo/ control arm then it will be considered that they had exhibited a placebo effect. How many would fall into that category? Maybe the majority of those who get well, if not all! For the doctors this will be frustrating because time after time the patients in the two arms of the drug trials will show little difference. Ah, you might say but some may get worse. True and is this a nocebo effect? Herein lies the third problem.

The third problem has to do with the safety of the drugs. Toxic people can use the fact that a person has started taking a drug or a new drug to play more foul games. They may create further problems for the person or they may convey ideas that the drug is harmful. Either way complications could develop in the patient or the patient may exhibit some adverse effect and it is reasonable for the research doctors to attribute this to the drug, if the patient is in the intervention arm. After all, the patient develops the problem at the same time as they started taking the drug. If they are in the control group then the problem of course will be considered as something coincidental and not be related to the drug. The drug’s safety may be brought into question and may be blamed for conditions that have nothing to do with the drug. Or somatic condition that arise, which are further complicated in the presence of the drug. So the drug may be prohibited citing safety issues, when in reality the drug is safe. And all of this can also be done by a drug company’s competitor if there are people in that company that are toxic and it can be easily done owing to the networking of toxic people.

In the next post I discuss the testing of Prayer, which is also problematic.

A Summary and the complete prayer

A Summary and the complete prayer.

I am not talking about remission here, which is what doctors talk about. Remission is the wanning or disappearance of the signs and symptoms of a disease. This is NOT good enough. It only means that they have removed some of the result of the body’s reactivity. It does not guarantee that the disease is cured. What a person needs is a cancer cure. That means getting rid of what causes the signs and symptoms and hence the disease. Ideas, emotional reactivity and toxic people are at the heart of the problem.

Prayer / mental prescription

-a request of God – a directive to the Universe ( Mind of God ).

Formulating the prayer.

Write down the entire prayer in detail and then using what you have written make yourself a recording and listen to it at least a few times a day.

The first part of the prayer is to:

1. recognize the negative suggestions.

2. Recognize that ideas are not in business for themselves. There has to be people behind the scenes that are presenting them for them to continually come to mind and trouble you.

3. Recognize that the ideas are only suggestions and that the associated fear is not related to the ideas but only coincidental.

4. Discard the negative ideas by recognizing that they are null and void and that by doing so you are rejecting the ideas.

Don’t use negatives for example “I’m not being gutted”. The problem here is that there is still the image of the person’s gut. Furthermore the toxic people you’re up against may try to use hash as for instance “I’m not being. Gutted!” Find the idea that the suggestion rests on and use it to negate the suggestion. So for instance if some worn floor boards had been removed and replaced then the reality was “the floor in the veranda got gutted”. This reflects the reality and it is not associated with your body. Discharging the negative ideas is easy once you realize that the ideas that were troubling you are mere suggestion AND you discover what event had been used to anchor the suggestion. There is NO foundation for their hateful desires and intentions of evil people. The Universe does not support suggestion and it does not support hate. For manifestation the suggestion has to be accepted.

5. And with this part of the prayer you need to address the issues that give rise to the emotional reactivity.

With number 5 it is extremely important to address the issues because the aim of the aggressors is to create issues to cause you emotional reactivity in your body or to point to activities that will also point to activity in the body or create such activity in the body. So your aim is to dismantle the issues and recognize the activity so they can’t be used to target a particular organ or tissue in the body. This is important to destroy the effects of nasty images that are presented, which are only partly conscious. Without the emotional reactivity the mirror neuron activity in your brain, which affects relevant areas in the body, won’t appear to be magnified. When you make your discoveries and change your attitude changes begin to take place in your body.

EMOTIONS.

FEAR. You don’t need to try and get rid of the fear because it is only the body’s mobilization. However you need to instruct your body that the danger is a threat that is not aimed to be carried out but to be used to try and manufacture belief and in some cases to cause fear reactivity to cause reactivity in certain organs. It is important to do this because firstly, it will lessen the fear, but secondly and very importantly it will instruct your immune system to go ahead and behave as normal. The immune system may be declined if there is a perceived outer threat and may over-react if there is a perceived inner (in the body) threat.

ANGER. Anger is aimed to either make you aggressively fight in the body, which will cause you to generate more cancer cells (which are extraordinary immune system cells) or activate certain organs that may be targeted by the hateful ideas. To get rid of anger it is important to address any issues that you have regarding injustice and/or violations that you feel. However the best way is to see that you are in a war, that as a warrior there is no position to be angry with injustice because aggression is the nature of war. Be resolved to fight in the real theatre of war.. in the mind.

SADNESS. Sadness is associated with issues of loss so resolve the issues. Find some way of overcoming the sadness. Don’t try to suppress it because that can make it worse. Loss of Joy is also along the same lines but affects different organs to sadness. You need to recover a feeling of joy somehow.

GRIEF. This is usually associated with intense sadness and more so despair. Again you need to somehow come to terms with whatever issues you have and find a place of resolution. If you have lost a loved one and you are a theist you can find solace in the union in the spiritual realm. If you are an atheist then you will need to find somehow to resolve the problem.

WORRY. This is usually associated with some issue that has no solutions and if that is the case then you can be sure it is associated with another cheat. Find a solution.

ANXIETY. This is usually either a mix of fear and worry or anger and worry. Issues in the first case have to do with some threat and in the second with some injustice or violation of some sort. Both are aimed to cause you to worry. Realize it is only a cheat and let go of the problem and/or resolve the issues that pose danger or create some injustice.

ACTIVITIES. Look for ideas that indicate activities such as “going” or “thinking” etc. You will find the ideas are general. Make them specific pointing at only one thing, which will remove the general case. Note too that general cases are meaningless because they do not point to anything.

Addressing issues and recognizing ideas about activities and putting them in the correct context you essentially stop the growth of the cancer.

The second part is to recognize that your body created the cancer as part of an unnecessary immune response that your body can clean it away again. And it will clear it away when you instruct your body to do so. You can now instruct your body to dismantle the extraordinary immune response that had been set into motion and which has now ceased as you have dealt with the issues. So you can tackle the cell mass directly. The instruction to the body is to revert all barrier /resistance cells (what doctors call cancer cells) back to fully specialized, fully functional cells of whatever tissues or organs they belong to. You might as well take advantage of the fact that healthy new cells will be created so why not rejuvenate your organs and tissues with healthy new cells while you’re in the process. If you’re over 50 years old then it’s a bonus. So when it comes to clearing away the excess cells, which is out by the immune system by apoptosis, the normal process of cell destruction, death and removal, instruct your body to remove old cells in preference to newer healthy cells.

The third part of the prayer is to use a counterattack to ward off your attackers. The theatre of war is in the mind so your counterattack has to be in the mind and NOT in your body. It is a good idea to look at the picture now and then. If you put it up on a wall it is best in your closet behind the clothes on your coat hangers or somewhere private. You must be sure though that it is private, for your eyes only.

Example of mental prescription (prayer) to treat lung cancer.

I hereby recognize that there are negative ideas about the smoke going into

my lungs and ideas about breathing toxic fumes and

I appreciate that those ideas are not in business for themselves.

There are toxic people, who are presenting these ideas,

Since those ideas cannot of themselves be continually coming to mind.

I recognize that the ideas about toxic fumes are only suggestions

and that the associated fear I feel is not related to the ideas

The fear is only coincidental.

I reject the ideas recognizing that they are null and void.

I hereby advise my body that the threats are artificial

So my immune system can behave normally again.

I recognize the hot feeling in my body is really anger

and this has to do with injustices and violations.

I see that I am in a war and I am a worthy warrior,

                                                    standing against the injustice.

I remain calm knowing that aggression is the nature of war

and I fight in the real theatre of war, which is in the mind.

I have been sad that I lost a job opportunity recently

but I put that behind me and I move on knowing

that when one door closes another opens.

I will find a new job within the next few months

and it will be even better than the opportunity that has gone by.

I recognize that my body created the barrier / resistance cells (cancer)

as part of an unnecessary immune response.

I also recognize that my body can now clear it away as it is unnecessary.

The problem I had perceived was only a fantasy.

I now instruct my body to dismantle that extraordinary immune

response, which has now ceased as I understand how it came about

and I have resolved all the issues. I am calm now.

I instruct my body to revert all barrier and resistance cells

(which doctors call cancer) back to fully specialized,

fully functional cells of whatever lung tissues they belong to.

In this process I know that healthy new cells will be created

I desire to rejuvenate my lung tissues with these healthy new cells.

I instruct therefore my immune system, through apoptosis,

to remove the older cells in preference to the new healthy lung tissue cells.

Then go and have a look at the pictures you’ve made.

I see the heads of my enemies cut off at the neck, floating in a pool of blood.

I have won against my enemies, my body is restored to health. So it is.

Kyrani Eade

8/February, 2014

Prayer’s Counterattack.

This gallery contains 4 photos.

Part 3 of the Prayer, the Counterattack. A person who has cancer is a person under mental attack, using ideas to try and cause the person to react somatically as to develop cancer, i.e., ideas are used as the weapons … Continue reading →

Metastasis and discussion of changes to cells

Metastasis.

How a person copes determines what happens in the body. If they react with new emotion, eg anger or sadness, can create a bigger or lesser problem. Their anger is justified because they are being violated but their anger can also be used against them. Same goes for other emotions. Sadness for instance is also justified because the person has lost their health and hence the life that they had. So if they had breast cancer to begin with then anger will mean that the liver might be attacked and sadness the lungs might be attacked. All of this is part of metastatic cancer because the body will use the immune products already made for the purpose. Cell in the primary tumour will be further modified to give them the ability to travel through the circulatory system and into new tissues, eg the liver or the lungs etc.

Often the toxic chief offender, with the help of the toxic mob, tries to create new issues and hence new emotions. So for instance a woman who has had her breasts removed will feel the loss and hence might not only feel sad but grieve. And her emotions are justified but the emotion that she naturally feels can be used to attack other organs. If she feels sad then the lungs could be attacked or if she feel grief then the bowel could be attacked. If she can be angered then the liver is commonly attacked. Liver activity is greatly accelerated with anger. Anger is about a person expressing themselves more emphatically in order to deal with some injustice. They may even need to become aggressive in order to deal with some violation committed against them. Anger is reactivity in the body that produces more energy so cells need to have more sugars available to make that energy. Sugar is stored in a readily convertible form in the liver. This can quickly supply the body with the fuel it needs to generate more energy and in the first instance because afterwards the sugar is moved out of storages sites in the body. Thus if a person can be episodically angered then the liver will episodically be activated. This is the basic problem in diabetes. High levels of sugar accumulate in the bloodstream since the body has not had enough time to clear the first load of sugar before the liver becomes highly active again and delivers more sugar into the bloodstream. In cancer of the liver, the sugar problem is secondary because the foul aim is to attack the liver and cause it to develop cell masses. However it explains why, in some instances diabetes is seen with cancer. A person with diabetes may develop cancer and a person with cancer may develop diabetes, depending on what sort of foul games are played.

If the person started out with colon cancer then metastatic cancer cells will be created in the primary tumour, i.e., the colon and moved to the liver. The body does not create new immune products to do a particular job if products that can be used to do the job already exist. All that needs to happen is for the immune products to be modified further in order to move them to new sites. So changes are made in some of the cancer cells that already exist to enable them to migrate. It is not just a chance event that some cells in the tumour develop “by chance” the right combination of miscopied genes to enable them to migrate. So it is not some change event that the “loosely held” cells just break off and enter the bloodstream and go off to “colonize” some other organ or tissue in the body. There are no chance miscopied genes and there are no viruses or other micro organisms that use the cells to reproduce themselves that cause changes as to cause cells to migrate to other areas of the body and to specific other areas as well because that is what we see.

You will find that certain cancers are seen to mostly metastasize in certain other areas. Metastasis is not random. For example, prostate cancer usually metastasizes to the bones, colon cancer to the liver, stomach cancer to the ovary in women, pancreatic cancer to the liver and lungs and so on. This was first recognized around 100 years ago. A “seed and soil” theory was put forward to explain it. It was thought that the cells needed to find similar conditions as for instance breast cells gather calcium irons from breast milk and go to the bone because there they would be able to gather calcium ions from bone. But breast cancer can also metastasize to the lung and there are no calcium ions there! This theory was challenged with another theory that metastasis occurs purely by anatomic and mechanical routes but neither of these theories provides real answers. And of course they don’t take the person’s emotions into account, that would no sit well with evolutionary biology! It smacks of teleology, the explanation of bodily events in term of purpose (indicated by ideas), a concept which is abhorred by biomedical scientists. Dawkins claims that even in the way the immune system works, which appears intelligent and purposeful, it is still only natural selection at work.. chance events and random variations! But even if they did take emotions into account they would get psychiatrists involved. This only makes things worse because their theories and methods are dreamt up in conferences. They do no science and have no bearing on reality.

New evidence.
Metastatic cancers are sometimes found at the same time as the primary tumor, but they can also be found months or even years later, which mean long after the primary tumor was removed. So the doctors say “it’s come back” because they find that most secondary or tertiary tumors are “metastatic” rather than a primary tumors. What this means is that the cells that form the secondary tumor are characteristically the same as those of the first tumor that the patient had. It was thought that metastatic cancers were only possible after a primary cancer had metastasized. But research later found that this was not the case. They found that some cells in the primary tumor had an expression of genes that gave these cells the potential to metastasize. And all of the cells created are stored in the body for future use.

Genetic expressions characteristic of metastatic tumor cells are called a “metastatic signature”. Signature genes might be “up-regulated” –i.e., more active, as for example genes involved in cell division or they may be “down-regulated” – i.e., less active or inactive so as to enable the cell to behave as an immune cell that moves to the part of the body where it is deemed to be needed. And we are told that all of this is the result of chance.. miscopying or damage and/or viral manipulation! We are talking about very specific and very relevant genes have their expression modified as to change the way a cell behaves. Not only do the definite and intentional changes create cancer cells but within their midst also metastatic cancer cells! Such develops constitute new information and that can only take place as a result of intelligence, the ability to acquire and apply knowledge. Intelligence gives rise to purpose driven changes in the body and at the cellular level. Teleology aye!

All of this is known! Everything of what I have described can be found in the medical /scientific literature! There is research that shows all of the following:

Types of cell that can change into any type of cell.
Unspecialized cells can differentiate, i.e., become specialize.
Cells differentiate to specialize for different functions.
Specialization changes the cell’s:
1. appearance (shape and size),
2. its membrane potential,
3. its metabolic activity and
4. its responsiveness to signals.
Stem cells both in the adult and embryo display such abilities.

There is in the literature an understanding about how these changes.
Changes are brought about by modifications in gene expression.

Some genes are in a sense turned on while others are turned off.
The specialized cells contain all of the genes in the genome
but expresses only genes needed for it to do only one job,.

A stem cell can select a set of genes to express
and thus transform itself into a specialized cell.
If it becomes a muscle cell
then it will express only those genes
that make it a muscle cell.

The cell switches from one type to another
by switching from one pattern of gene expression to another.

Is this a one way street? NO!

Cells can dedifferentiate, i.e., they can become unspecialized.
In nature we see cells revert back to being less specialized.
This is seen with regenerative processes.

It is seen in tissue cultures where cells can lose properties,
eg., their shape or protein expression may change.

Is this seen in humans?
Medical scientists say “not normally”. BUT their literature says yes!
They claim that this natural part of the immune response has been lost in humans.
Some scientists say that this “abnormality” in human is the reason for cancer.

BUT another way of explaining the appearance of dedifferentiation in humans
as using the power of dedifferentiation but using it wrongly.
They unwittingly create unnecessary cell masses in their bodies.

When we accept that intelligence is at work
then we may learn to use it properly
and be able to regenerate our bodies indefinitely…
and regenerate them at will!

YEAH there is an upside to cancer!

What about “mutations”?
To understand this you need to understand a little about genetics. I will try to keep it simple because I know that most people who read this are not scientists. The DNA molecule is a double helix containing the four nucleotide molecules, which are also called bases. You can think of the double helix like a spiral staircase.

The bases, which form the steps, are either A (adenine) paired with T (thymine) or G (guanine) paired with C (cytosine). The code is written in triplets, so each set of 3 bases is the code to make one amino acid of the 20 possible amino acids that can be made. So for example GCT is the code that is used to make the amino acid alanine.
Amino acids are the building blocks of proteins.

A gene is a length of code that will make one protein molecule.

Most DNA damage affects the primary structure of the double helix; that is, the bases.
Bases may be chemically changed so their regular structure is disrupted,
as for example made more bulky or contain different types of chemical bonds.

There are incredible capabilities within the cell. There are DNA sequences that can change their position within the genome. These “jumping genes” can create or reverse changes and even alter the size of the genome.

If a virus infects the cell and inserts its DNA into the genome then the cell knows to mark off all of the viral sequence so that in replication it is not copied. So the virus does not do damage that cannot be repaired. Nature is intelligent. But, the scientists claim “in susceptible individuals this might not happen”. Bull! They are the same species, their cells work in the same way as other people’s. The reason is not in their biology but in how they unwittingly react to foul play, which they are unaware of and which they are deceived by medical misinformation, especially about their ESP capabilities.

Mutations in genes can either have:
• no effect,
• alter the product of a gene, or
• prevent the gene from functioning properly or completely.
•
Added to this is the fact that not only a huge number of changes are made but those changes are NOT random. Those changes give specific properties to the cells that are created. AND those new properties can be seen to have a high degree of similarity from one person to the next with the same type of cancer. And at the same time a biopsy of different areas of a cancer shows different gene signatures. The cells are diverse in character.

Genetic markers turn genes on and off.
It is accomplished by DNA methylation and histone modification.
These processes either restrict or permit the transcription of target genes.

Cancer cells are extraordinary immune system products. They are moved to lymph glands where they are stored, as lymphocytes (B cells and T cells) are stored. And they are most commonly moved through the lymphatic system, which leads into the bloodstream. The variety of new changes to form cancer cells allow them to be transported and stationed in the new locations in the same way as lymphocytes. Receptor sites on the cell walls of such cells signal to other cells in the body, as for example in the blood vessel walls that these are immune system products.

It is possible that there is damage but is that the cause of cancer? If we look at the changes that have been reported in breast cancer, then it is hard to believe these are mere damage to genes.

The BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are human genes and their protein products are called BRCA1 BRCA2 respectively, (without the italics). They have been named “breast cancer 1” and “breast cancer 2” because they are considered to be human “tumor suppressor” genes. In fact it is only a gene associated with many other substances that together are involved in cell repair (cell changes) and cell death.

BRCA1 and BRCA2 help repair damaged DNA or destroy cells if DNA cannot be repaired. They are expressed in the cells of breast but they are also found in other tissues too. They are said to be involved in “error-free repair” of DNA double strand breaks. Are they error-free repair or is this their main observed function in normal (usual) circumstances. When these genes are themselves changed, they are, in turn, involved in changes that doctor want to call errors. However this is only a hypothesis based on limited knowledge, namely that they see them coincident with cancer and cancer is “not normal”. But if we see cancer as a purpose-driven creation of what is really an extraordinary immune organ, albeit erroneously ignited, then the changes to these genes are not damage or errors but deliberate changes.

Modified parts of the DNA, which are also considered to be damaged, they say are “not repaired properly”. In fact these changes may simply be part of the way stem cells can transform themselves to assume a different specific function, seen as cancer. They see the changes to BRAC1 and BRAC2 and talk about “breast cancer susceptibility genes” and “breast cancer susceptibility proteins”. It sure sounds like they are taking about a proto-oncogene (“before tumor producing genes”) turning into an oncogene (“tumor producing genes”) but BRAC1 and BRAC2 are normal genes; it is their mutation that is unusual and thus called abnormal. And they talk about “an increased risk” when the mutations are present BUT even with the mutations the person does not mean you get cancer.

The structures of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are different, but they both combine with other substances that they also call “tumor suppressors”. The naming here of tumor suppressors arises from the assumptions that cancer cells arise normally in the body and they are destroyed and only when there are failures in the system do they multiply and grow into a tumor. The proteins made by both genes are essential for repairing damaged DNA, but we could also say that they are essential for simply making changes to DNA, some of which is damage.

Hundreds of mutations in the BRCA2 gene have been identified by scientists. Many of these changes are said to cause an increased risk for cancer. The mutations to the BRCA2 gene are either the insertion or deletion of a small number of base pairs in length of code that forms the gene, so the protein product of the BRCA2 gene does not function in the usual way. Sometimes a large segment or segments of DNA may be rearranged.

Researchers say that the defective protein made from the gene is unable to help fix the mutations found in other genes. So there is an accumulation of mutations and this they say causes cells to divide in an uncontrolled way. And note that accumulation has to be of relevant genes that bring about special properties in the cancer cell. They are not random accumulations. Thus the word “uncontrolled” only presupposes that the cell is literally a machine that has just malfunctioned. We do see what appear as factories and machines made of protein and other substances in the cell but the cell is a living entity. So what they see as uncontrolled cell division of a machine that is malfunctioning may be deliberate rapid cell division of a living entity seeking to create an extraordinary immune organ. What you believe and hence use to describe the biology makes a big difference.

It is estimated that women with an abnormal BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes have
75-80% risk of getting breast cancer, and including all women young and old,
The risk of getting ovarian cancer is:
about 50% if they have the BRCA1 mutation and
about 25% if they have the BRCA2 mutations.

However we can read these statistics the other way. A woman has a
20% chance of having the 2 genes mutated and NOT get breast cancer, and
about 50% chance of having only BRAC1 mutation and/ or
about 75% chance of having the BRAC2 mutation
and NOT get ovarian cancer.

I suggest that a truer way of assessing the risk and explaining the incidence is to say a woman has a 75-80% risk of getting breast cancer and/or a 25- 50% risk of getting ovarian cancer if they have toxic garbage in their family, especially toxic next of kin or closely associated toxic people, especially toxic best friends, toxic confidants and toxic work associates etc.

Thus if they are the target of foul play, they may unwittingly react as to bring about changes in their genetic code so as to develop cancer cells. And such toxic garbage is not obvious; most of them act out a “lovey-dovey” persona when in fact they are fire-breathing hate-snakes. So the woman may believe her husband is a wonderful man, when in fact his is her abuser. And similarly the man who believes his is married to the woman of his dreams, when in reality she is his abuser. Sometimes there are tell tale signs, for example a feeling of annoyance and irritation with the other party and without apparent cause. Of course it is put down to the nature of the disease. It is really anger that is not apparent and for good reason because the foul play is subtle and there are other people involved.

All of this damage and errors in copying and replicating business is based on modern biology and modern biology considers that we are machines. All life on earth are material machines. If we are mere robots then there are no purpose-driven events taking place in the body. Biomedical scientists explain everything they see in terms of the machine just malfunctioned or got damaged. It justifies modern Western medicine proclaiming profitable physical means to cure disease. Money is the reason for the drive behind “the war on free will” and “the war on God and hence religion” because by destroying these then the robot story is set in concrete.

We are not machines and as we are not machines events in the body of living beings, from animals and humans (and I would also include plants), there are purpose driven events. So the good news is that you can change your beliefs and make selections to drive the biology in a different way, for a different purpose.

Scientists have seen the reversal of cancer in thousands of recorded cases. A database exists of thousands of recorded spontaneous remissions. These are by no means all of the cases but only the recorded ones, a small minority. And these remissions occurred for no apparent reason. There was nothing physical done by the patient or to the patient that lead to the remission. So how do they explain these? What, the machine suddenly worked properly again AND fixed the damage? Really! If that was the case then wouldn’t you think that they would study these cases too? Of course not, there’s no money in that. They simply suggest that the immune system started working again and killed the tumour, despite the fact that they see that the cancer cells sit side by side with immune cells that assist the cancer cells in the first place. It assists them because cancer cells are immune products. And just as an inflammatory response can flare up with no “biologically obvious reason” so too the building of what I call barrier and resistance cells also develop and grow for no “biologically obvious reason”. However there is reason but that reason is denied to protect financial interests. Cancer is BIG business. Damage and errors in genes and machines malfunctioning take control away from the patient and puts the doctor in the driver’s seat.

Cells can and do repair DNA damage and errors. Spontaneous remission happens because the person has had a change of ideas and beliefs. Thus the cancer cells revert their mutated base sequences back to their original state. I have done just that and not once or twice but at least half a dozen times.

You might say it seems knowledge of how the foul play works is needed. So how come there was cancer in ancient times before any of the biology was understood by anyone. The answer to that is that evil people don’t know what goes on in the body, except of course those in modern times who are doctors or medical scientists or who have studied the biology. I had once explained how a panic attack comes about by explaining the biology to an evil person. He shrugged his shoulders and said “gee I never thought about it like that”. All he knew was that if you do “x” then “y” appears to happen. The foul games have been developed over the years but much more so in recent times. I strongly suspect with the help of medical experiments. I suspect that experiments are being done to see how cancer can be created more easily and more quickly and that information made available through the toxic networks. Knowledge of what happens in the body is not needed by the foul game players. Evil people have learnt over the years that certain ideas and activities that are covert can cause a related person to react. That knowledge alone is what most evil people are taught by their evil elders, most often evil parent or parents. And it is that knowledge that is passed down from generation to generation.

The second formulation of the prayer, once you realize that you created the cancer, so too you can clean it away again, is as follows.
I instruct my body to revert the cancer cells back to fully functional cells of whatever tissues and organs they belong to. So for instance if they are lung cancer cells then you instruct that they revert back to fully functional, fully specialized cells of what ever lung tissues they belong to.
AND that all excesses be rapidly removed by apoptosis.
I also add one extra thing. Since the cells created will be newer cells and rejuvenated cells then I also instruct that in the apoptosis process that older cells be removed in preference to the younger, newer cells. You might as well rejuvenate your organs given the opportunity.

In the next post I will discuss the counter attack to ward off the enemy.

Why the person develops cancer.

Why the person develops cancer.

Note: this continues on from the last post.
For cancer to develop the targeted organ or tissue needs to be activated and this is done by two main methods.

One is to create issues so that other emotions become involved. These emotions may also be unclear in some cases and may become obvious after a diagnosis. And if they do they may appear to be as a result of a diagnosis. Certainly for most people a diagnosis of cancer is frightening so there is added fear and understandably. You only need to look at how many survive beyond ten years to appreciate their fear is justified. However that fear can become a part of the foul play as well and compounds the health problems the person faces already. This can also be true of anxiety (mix of fear and worry, or anger and worry are the main forms of anxiety), sadness, despair, anger, loss of joy and worry.

The emotions are associated with particular organs of the body because some of the processes and events that take place in the body are part and parcel of emotional reactivity. So the relevant organs will have some extra activity. So for instance crying is a characteristic of sadness and even if the person does not actually shed tears water metabolism is still affected. For example extra activity in the lungs associated with the short sharp breathing of crying can still occur, though far less than in actual crying. However this can still cause congestion in the lungs. The main organs which involve the movements of water are the skin, the bowel, the lungs and the kidney but they are not all associated with crying and the upheaval felt in the body is caused by the ideas of loss. If the sadness goes to grief then the bowel is affected as I explained above in the section on bile acids being present in the colon. Sometimes this activity is obvious, sometimes it is obscure. If the person feels sadness then the lungs are the main area with activity so ideas of harm in the lung are used in a cheat. Ideas about toxic smoke or tar getting into the lungs and “smoking causes lung cancer” found on cigarette packets (as an ever present affirmation to a smoker) are easily used. Sadness and the very act of breathing in, if the person is a smoker, will cause activity in the lungs. Ideas can activate mirror neurons in the brain, which in turn can cause activity to be felt in some part of the body. If these ideas and the activity felt coincide with the activity due to sadness and actions, such as smoking, then the activity felt due to mirror neurons may appear to account for the activity in the lungs. A smoker is conscious of the lungs inflating and the action of smoke filling the alveoli etc., but it seems they are not aware of it. In fact they are aware only the focus of interest is not associated with smoking, as also it may not be associated with the activity caused by sadness. The ideas capture attention and the focus of interest so all of the activity can be wrongly attributed to the ideas. This is the aim of the cheaters because that is what will make the person move their body to action.

There are different emotions associated with different cancers.
For example:
Lung cancer – sadness
Ovarian (and probably also testicular) cancer – sadness involved
Bowel cancer – despair or grief
Liver cancer – anger
Oesophageal cancer the anger & worry form of anxiety
Bone cancer – fear
Kidney cancer – fear
Stomach cancer –worry

The other main method of activation of an organ or tissue is the use ideas of actions taking place, which are anchored in some activity of a person’s life. These ideas are based on real events but made general and used with other ideas to give rise to reactivity in an organ or tissue.
Two examples:
1. The pancreas can be activated to higher than normal levels of activity by ideas of “it’s going” or “it’s got the go” etc., BUT there needs to be a real event to anchor this idea. So if there is a real case of a person doing something or waiting to do something, as for instance go on a holiday, then the expectation of action can be used in foul game play. The idea of activity causes the body to move sugar into the blood stream and for the pancreas to make and release insulin to enable cells to use the sugar that has been made available. Insulin acts as a key to get the sugar past the cell wall. The activity of the pancreas is then married together with hateful images of attacking the area of the organ; as for instance barely conscious ideas of a knife put into the person’s midriff. Such ideas may give an unusual feeling in the area.

One of the early signs of pancreatic cancer is of having lots of energy but not being able to think as clearly as normal, together with a dull pain or unusual nauseas-like feeling in the midriff area. Thinking is affected because the brain is affected. With a more than normal insulin in the blood stream the cells in the body get a higher proportion of sugar so the brain is partly starved. This means that unnecessary activity in the brain such as thinking is affected, as the brain uses the sugar for vital activities. To overcome the problem, given that you recognize the cheat, all you need to do is recognize that “going” is general. So make an affirmation that links the “going” with the holiday or whatever it is. The “going” becomes specific and cannot be associated with other ideas. The ideas of “going” can only be used if they are general. All of us tend to think, using what we mean to be specific, in general terms. If you suspect foul play then you need to be specific in your thinking to overcome the problem.

2. The brain activity associated with thinking can be used to cause reactivity in the brain that leads to brain cancer. And suggestion can be as simple as “what’s that you’re thinking about”. If it’s a question and if the person is engaged in some project then this will cause more thinking as well as the thinking the person is already engaged in. It could also be hashed to “what’s that, you’re thinking.. a bout”, which of course changes the meaning and adds something sinister. Various images of harm can be associated with “what’s that” and “a bout” etc. Thinking requires activity in the brain and images may also cause mirror neuron activity that targets the thinking area. This means that the specific area for thinking in the front of the brain has more activity than is normal for thinking. There will be an impression that the activity is due to the images when indeed most of the activity is due to thinking. The use of mobile phones which are held close to the head is another way used. This is greatly aided when the media reports medical stories about “mobile phone use linked to cancer”. The person needs to buy into and believe that the radiation associated with a mobile phone will go into their brain and do harm. Here again it is activity in the brain that is used. When a person uses a mobile phone they are normally talking to someone, so their brain will be engaged in a number of different activities, including hearing and short term memory as well as thinking and some excitement or other emotion, all of which involve activity in the brain. If they are simultaneously targeted, which can so easily be done, even by the very person they are talking to, then again images that trigger mirror neurons can be used. These images create activity that comes on top of what is normal and associated with thinking and talking and listening etc. Such activity can be erroneously taken to be due to the imagery of rays going into the brain and doing harm, especially to a lay person, who doesn’t understand the issues.

My insightful observations at the cellular level.
At first and not on every occasion, there may be an inflammatory response as I described above, but it is soon realized that as the ideas persist this response is not useful. So the body, in most cases ceases the inflammatory response and goes on a different course of action. A barrier or resistance front is built to protect or ward off the perceived danger. The only material that the body has, with which to build such a barrier, is cells. The stem cells on the surface of the organ or tissue, which is thought to be under attacked, are used for the purpose. These cells are capable of transformation. I have insightfully observed such transformation taking place. I have been able to insightfully perceive at the cellular level from early childhood. When I had first looked under a microscope at cells I was amazed to see cells with my eyes what I could see mentally. It proved to me that my mental ability was genuine. In the mid 1980’s I had developed this ability further when I learnt Buddhist walking meditation. I can now see at the sub-cellular level at the various organelles and structure found inside a cell, whereas before I could see the cell with a darker patch where the nucleus was found. I am still in the process of developing this ability further. I can see some detail at the sub-organelle level and sufficient to have perceived generally what is going on but not enough to observe genes and the fine working of protein machines. They appear too hazy.

I have seen that in the very first instance, a layer of different looking cells at the very surface of an organ’ inner or outer surface or of a tissue would appear and grow larger. Then I had occasion to look at the very beginning, when the first few cells were transformed. I had been given some mastic sweet together with some groceries I had bought. The shopkeeper told me that it was past it’s due date and she would have thrown it out. She knew I liked mastic so she gave it to me and told me that if I didn’t want it to “just throw it away”. I could see that this was an attempt to try and create oesophageal cancer. It was a golden opportunity for me to observe, from the very beginning, the whole process. But I also knew that as I wasn’t angry I would not see a really dramatic effect.

Sure enough that very night I experience a very hot feeling and ideas of “it’s toxic and doing you harm” and that “it was tree resin and out of date and hence toxic” and so on. I let the ideas stand and I observed a cytotoxic attack in an area further down from my throat. It was being damaged by an inflammatory response. I was able to halt the inflammatory response by upholding ideas that “this response was not going to do any good” but I continued to allow the ideas of “toxic.. tree resin.. out of date.. harmful etc., that were being addressed to me by toxic people trying to harm me. I then focused on the area that had been attacked and had become sore earlier. Now I saw cells being transformed. Before cell division they had a different look to the look they had after they divided. And while the cells that originally divided looked like cells further away, those that were produced looked different. I had also looked at them more closely and noted that there were differences in the early part of the cell’s dividing cycle. It was as if there was some stagnation and nothing seemed to be happening for a while. I suspect this was before the DNA copying began. I suspect also that there was activity that was too subtle for me to observe. I suspect some genes are somehow changed but as my insightful perception is not good enough to perceive these details so I cannot say this with certainty. But it was easy enough to see that the changes made the cell more primitive in their form and function. And the new cells appeared to be more active, especially in dividing and in their movements against one another than the cells further away and outside of the new layer.

I then discharged the thoughts of harm and ate the mastic with confidence that it was harmless. I again continued my insightful observations. I could see that the cells again underwent changes. This time the cells reverted back to their previous look but not during cell division. In fact it was hard to find any dividing. There was greater activity inside the cell for a time and then the cells began to look more and more like the normal cells around them. I wanted to apply my prayer formula but by the time I had got that far most were already back to normal. However I did expect that the cells would revert back because I have affirmed that in prayer in a dozen times on other occasions. So it is possible that the cells changed more quickly than they would have without this affirmation. I rang the lady and asked her if she had any more mastic and it didn’t matter if it was out of date, I’d still buy it but she said she hadn’t, so I was unable to repeat that experiment.

I have seen on other previous occasions that if the ideas persist and especially if the ideas seem overwhelming then these more primitive cells begin to divide much faster. The layer becomes thicker and small capillary blood vessels grow towards and into this new cell mass. It is not unlike seeing tissue healing after a cut or some damage. I had had an accident and ran into a large bolt that was sticking out of a door. It went into my upper arm on the inside just above the joint and stuck there. I had to pull it out and there was blood squirting out. I had used this occasion as a meditative observation in order to see if I could get ordinary cells to grow faster. It was possible but they reflected a mental blueprint and in some sense seemed to grow to a preordained pattern and no further. They didn’t just grow and grow. And of course there was no fear and anger that could have contributed to extraordinary cells and growth. On that occasion I had also seen how as the new tissue grew so too the blood supply was extended and capillaries grew into the new tissue.

Anger is essential.
Anger, as I mentioned above is a very necessary ingredient in cancer because the person must be made aggressive. But the aggression has to be honed so that the person struggles against what they see as some “nebulous inner force”. This struggle is critical to causing cancer. I have seen that no amount of anger is capable of igniting cancer if the person recognizes the cheat. One does not engage in an inner struggle by recognizing that the villains are far from nebulous. The villains are real people, with names and addresses and phone numbers, flesh and blood and bones! When you know that you know that a struggle in the body is fiction.. not real. It is also worth saying that suggestions that are all fleeting and barely conscious are useless in causing cancer. The personal self needs to be moved and moved significantly and that cannot be done by ideas that are barely conscious. The personal self needs to be set into a struggle and driven to struggle. I have found that since my enemies have tried to be elusive and present ideas that are barely conscious most of the time, I have found it extremely easy to avoid disease, even when I am angered.

An evil person on the other hand is at a greater disadvantage because rage is an inner quality of evil people. Rage is what they take pride in, see it as booty and use it as a weapon against others. However in the case where they themselves are under attack by “their own people”, i.e., other evil people, then that rage means the cancer will grow at an enormous speed. An evil person has no chance of winning against cancer, especially if the aim of the toxic mob is to kill them. Evil people become enraged if they are opposed. I’ve known evil people that became angry even if you disagreed with them about the weather. The rage of being opposed causes them to set forth a huge struggle that becomes aggressive cancer.

I should also say that while anger provides extra fuel materials in the bloodstream that can allow cells, which start to divide, to do so more rapidly, the fuel availability is not enough to cause cancer. I have been angered repeatedly in recent years and I have easily avoided cancer and diabetes, both of which are based around anger. So I can safely say that the availability of fuels and nutrients in the bloodstream do not make changes at the cellular level that translate to abnormality.

Bad days.
The changes that take place in the cells and the growth of the cell mass occur at certain times and on certain days and not on continuously. The struggle took place at times when I had felt a lot of fear and/or anger or was aware of a lot of heat in my body. At such times I was making a lot of effort to fight the seeming internal aggressors. I had felt a struggle going on. And on those days I also noticed extremely aggressive growth of the cells in a mass that had formed. Then I realized that toxic people gather and at such times criminals are employed and given the means to pose danger. Thus there are days when this happens and days when this does not happen. And sometimes such gatherings may go on for several hours and other times for a day or two at a time. These are what cancer patients refer to as “bad days”. It is possible using simple mental techniques to observe the source of the fear and anger and to recognize the angry aggressors that stand behind the issues in mind. Indeed it is possible to use this method to draw their faces because an aggressor that is attacking cannot hide their face within the mental realm. Physical means cannot protect or hide them. Even when they use other people to hide behind, they can still be seen. Both the strongly related and the trivially related people can be “remote viewed” out of the mental darkness. You can draw them and see who you are up against. And such drawings can be used in a counter attack as I will describe in the next section.

 

to be continued

Part 2 of a prayer or mental prescription: needs explaining

The Directive to the Universe to change cancer cells back to normal.
To fully appreciate this section of the prayer it is very important to have an idea in mind about what this section means otherwise the words to instruct the body to revert the cancer cells back to normal cells might seem hard or impossible to believe. So it is important to understand that there is a “medical story” being sold to the public. The story is aimed at making people feel out of control of the situation and afraid enough to seek medical help from doctors and at any cost; thus the ideas of damaged genes, genetic copying errors and viruses etc. These ideas make people feel helpless where their body and health are concerned. Added to this are the suggestions made by doctors that it’s so easy, just eat right, exercise every day and sleep well and you are healthy! I have known a number of healthy people who got cancer and died in a few months to a year.

The cancer story.
The story sold to the public is that cancer is about “out of control cells” which naturally appear in the body, which “grow uncontrollably” to form masses, if they are not killed by the immune system. These out-of-control “rogue cells” may migrate through the blood stream to “colonize” other parts of the body.. what is called then metastatic cancer.

My findings.
I have found that cancer is about modified cells made deliberately from stem cells by the body where there is a (manufactured) belief of danger to some part of the body. The body’s response is to form a barrier for defense. And if this defense is believed to be needed elsewhere in the body, then some of the modified cells, which are nothing more than extraordinary immune products, go to those new areas and form barriers there too. Cancer is not just a mass of “out of control cells” and one phenomenon shows this well, -spontaneous remission. People in their thousands have become well without taking any particular course of action. The argument is that suddenly their immune system has kicked in and killed all those cell masses. This too is a false argument, not to call it a downright outright lie. Doctors see that the cancer mass is made up of only 40% of cancer cells and the rest are regular immune system cells that act to assist the cancer cells. In reality the whole mass is made of immune system cells, only some are the regular sort and some are created for the purpose.

When I tried to tell one doctor about ideas being behind cancer he reacted with “we’re talking about a physical mass!” And his voice was a screeching pitch. His reaction is the norm because that is all that they are taught in medical school. Of course we are talking about a physical mass but the body made that mass for some reason. If you do not consider the ideas and treat only the physical aspects then you have to account for the changes in genetic expression. Thus doctors make assumptions about miscopied genes and damage because they are locked into the “linked causes” view AND evolutionary biology.

On one of my blogs I discussed an analogous situation, one that many people may relate to. If there is an infection on the skin or damage to the skin we see an inflammatory response. The inflammatory response is something different. It is not normal, when we use the word “normal” to mean “usual”. Doctors use the word normal to mean healthy. Is an inflammatory response normal, i.e., healthy? The answer is “it depends”! If they find some microbes such as bacteria or if they find the skin is damaged then they say the inflammatory response is healthy. If however they do not find microbes or damaged skin they turn to talking about “an immune system malfunction” and hence they would say either “an allergy” or “an autoimmune disease”. This is the outcome of evolutionary biology. All life on Earth evolved from dead matter. Thus all life is robotic.. life is nothing other than a huge variety of different machines. Even the mind and consciousness is being described as machine programming, software and brain circuitry etc. If something is wrong and cannot be explained using “linked causes” then it is explained as a machine malfunction. The truth however is very different. Ideas are at the heart of the issues of disease and also biology. Human beings are not machines and are affected by the underlying reality, which is the mind. Ideas play a crucial role in how a person will respond somatically.

Ideas can trigger an inflammatory response.
On my main blog at http://kyrani99.wordpress.com/2011/12/31/two-simple-uses-of-fear-and-esp-in-foul-game-play/
I give two examples the first one is “a fall in love at first sight cheat” and the second one -look half way down the page under the heading of allergic reactions- has to do with the “inflammatory responses cheat”. It is about how a person can be affected by the idea of a ring being toxic and thus harmful to their skin. Ideas are mentally presented to deceive another person. It is done either to gain power over the other person or to get pleasure from their suffering or both. And don’t expect that they are going to look like villains. On the contrary they are going to appear as your allies, falling over themselves to try and help you. Toxic others are used to pose danger so that the person targeted reacts with fear. The person detects the danger, if they have been relationally entangled with those posing danger. A person’s body normally reacts with fear if they detect danger. However with a weak or trivial relationship to the criminals they do not have enough information about the danger. They don’t know if the danger is external or internal. If at the same time there is an idea that depicts the ring as the source of danger, then the person wrongly assumes that the fear they feel is associated with the idea. In this case the idea is that the ring on the woman’s finger is toxic to her skin. The fear is seen as the evidence that the idea must be real. Thus the idea is upheld with confidence, which makes it a belief. The body will launch an inflammatory response in the area under the ring. I have seen cases where such an inflammatory response arises very rapidly and become so bad that the person can’t wear the ring anymore. It is a way of toxic people depriving the woman of some enjoyment. However with the realization that the idea is only suggestion and the danger is external and not related to the suggestion about the ring, then the inflammatory response subsides because a new belief take the place of the old one. The new idea is that the ring is safe to wear. If the person is fast enough in that realization then no inflammatory response is ignited. One belief ignites and another belief stops the body’s inflammatory response! And where there was damage to the skin owing to an inflammatory response then an anti-inflammatory response is ignited to clean up the damage to the skin under the ring. If we can detect brain activity associated with the belief, then maybe we can talk about linked causes to some extent but the true cause is not the brain activity. A belief is an idea strongly held in mind and the mind is not the brain and/or the brain’s activity, it is non-physical. If it was all only physical then such foul games could not be played.. not only there would be no inflammatory response, without foul play there would be no cancer in the world. The medical bonanza gone.

What are we to call the inflammatory response in this cases? It is not normal in sense of it not being a usual event. It is not normal in the sense of it being unhealthy because there was no real need for it. It was initiated because there was a belief that it was needed and that belief depended on ideas presented with coincident but unrelated danger.. a cheat! I don’t think the words “immune system malfunction” are appropriate or even correct because the immune system did not malfunction. It functioned normally but the person erroneously set it forth. Cancer is exactly the same thing and just as an inflammatory response can be arrested so can cancer. Indeed when you are alert to the cheat from the start you do not develop cancer in the body because there are no beliefs that would set the body in that direction.

Certainly genetics is involved and we have been told for decades now that the genes are passed down to us from our parents and that they dictate what happens to our bodies and even how we behave. It was the “central dogma” but in more recent times the central dogma has been replaced by a whole new area called epigenetics. Epigenetics points to the reason for the appearance of cancer cells. It is hard to appreciate how body chemistry and cellular activity can influence our genetic code and more particularly as a result of beliefs. So I will point first to evidence that shows that the accepted theory has problems and give an alternative view.

Mutations are caused by?
The mediators that doctors claim cause a mutation or change to a gene are either from outside the body, i.e., come from the environment and are:
1. UV light, from the sun
2. Carcinogens – high on the list are substances found in tobacco smoke.
3. Radioactivity
4. Microorganisms such as bacteria and viruses.
or from inside the body and they are:
1. Some immune system cells such as macrophages and neutrophils
2. Bile acids that they find in the colon

Let’s examine these.
External factors supposedly causing cancer.
UV radiation.
UV light is blamed for some skin cancers and there is plenty of talk about holes in the ozone layer in the Earth’s atmosphere and more UV light getting in. And there is a tendency to see this as reasonable evidence BUT we can see a dramatic increase in just 15 years since the mid 1990’s. UV light from the sun has not increased so dramatically in this time as to justify these increases in cancer, if the UV light is to blame. What about people spending more time in the sun and particularly with light colored skins? We find dark skinned people, who for thousands of years practically lived under the sun all day long, now getting skin cancer! I’m not convinced that the sun has anything to do with it at all.

Carcinogens.
Carcinogens are substances that supposedly cause cancer by damage to genes. The carcinogens highest on the list are found in cigarette smoke and said to be the cause of lung cancer, which has sky-rocketed in recent years. It is by no means limited to people who smoke. Why are more non-smokers getting lung cancer than ever before? Smoking has been bans in public places in the last ten to fifteen years so most people who don’t smoke do not encounter smoke in the air very often. Then there are cultures where there has been heavy smoking for many centuries and they only have developed lung cancer in the last fifty year!

To prove the “link” between smoking and lung cancer some researchers took a bunch of monkeys and subjected them to a brutal regime of smoking. They found the monkey got lung cancer and claimed they had proved a link between smoking and lung cancer but I smell a rat! I suspect that there was more to the story than was published.

I had thought originally that maybe the ideas were inadvertent and problematic but I now doubt this. I now strongly believe that there are medical experiments done, particularly in the field of cancer research, to look for more efficient ways of causing cancer and passing that information on through the toxic /evil subculture, which would explain the explosion of cancer incidence in the last thirty-five years. In reporting their experiments and findings in medical journals however they don’t mention anything about ideas and ill intent.

 Cultures of living tissues have also been used to supposedly “test” substances for being carcinogens. And they found everything but the kitchen sink could “potentially” cause cancer. And note the word “potentially” because it is very relevant. It is really a way of doctors covering themselves. Back in the 1990’s there were experiments done with common substances that had been handled and eaten by humans for thousands of years, such as tomatoes and broccoli. And they found these to be carcinogens! How?

These results of course are published without mention of the associated thoughts. They just record the physical details of the experiments. And this is of course “good science” and “supported by scientific community”. If the ideas are reported then it becomes “woo woo science”! I have been targeted many, many times and I had, on a dozen or more occasions, developed cancer. I have been able to treat every single case without medical help. The first time I followed my instinct but I began to realize that when I resolved issues and dismissed the suggestions made, recognizing they were false ideas, I recovered from the cancer; In some latter cases even in a matter of a day! I resolved a bone cancer the size of a large grain of rice in 24 hours! And the proof is there alright because I would have the “immune products” or what doctors call cancer cells in the lymphatic system in my body. I am now able to prevent the cancer from forming in the first place. So I find the monkey story sus, the cell cultures getting cancer by carcinogens sus and I have seen other experiments as well that are equally sus.

Even radioactivity can be challenged since after Nagasaki and Hiroshima were bombed in the Second World War, it was found that the number of people who got cancer was not significantly different from the average of the population! And knowing that why scare people that the very treatments they administer to supposedly cure the cancer will give them more cancer?

Microorganisms.

The next category, and one that is very fashionable these days, is microorganisms and particularly viruses cause cancer. Millions of young women as they enter adolescence are vaccinated against the human papillomavirus (HPV) because doctors claim it will prevent them from getting cervical cancer! There is no real evidence that this is so. If you look into scientific reports you will find that most doctors are cautious about what they say. Many only say that viruses etc., are “linked with”, “associated with”, “implicated in” or “somehow involved with” the appearance of cancer. The truth is that they know that viruses do not cause cancer. As some suggest, “cancer is a multi-step thing”.

It is true that probably about 80% or more of people with a variety of cancers blamed on the human papillomavirus will be found to have the virus but so what? The HPV and the many strands of the virus, at one stage or another of a person’s life, infect almost the entire global population. And the virus has left copies of itself in people’s genomes. It is part of the viral replication process. To account for this they say that in the vast majority of cases people’s immune system clears away the infection without the need of medical help. So they go on to say that in a small number of cases (about 5-10%) this doesn’t happen and the person has the virus over many years. How do they know this? They don’t know! Indeed they go so far as to suggest that the process takes 10–15 years and that they see pre-cancerous lesion during that time. On what evidence? They would need to screen the vast majority of the population over many years and to allow lesions they might see to develop and see if in how many years the lesion might become cancer, to be able to say such a thing. It is mere suggestion.

Next they look at how viruses behave and try to connect the activities of the virus with the properties of cancer cells. HPV is a DNA virus, which means it has to enter into the cell nucleus and use the protein machines that are there for its own purposes, i.e., to replicate itself. The protein machines only exist in the nucleus when a cell is dividing because they are produced when a cell is preparing for cell division. So the virus has to enter a cell that is dividing. Otherwise the virus has to stimulate the cell into dividing in order for cell make the necessary machinery. However even with such stimulus from the virus, cells do not start to divide endlessly and the virus cannot continue to make copies of itself inside the cell endlessly. It has to leave the cell to mature in order to be ready to reproduce again by entering into another cell. There are changes to the cell because the viral DNA is inserted into the DNA of the cell but that still does not mean the cell will start dividing endlessly. The viral stimulus to cause the cell to divide is a single incident. HPV is present in cancer patients but it is also present in people who have no cancer! And in the end one has to ask for how many millions of years has the virus existed? I would say it has existed at least for centuries, so how come it’s only supposedly affecting people now and not for all of that time? One “out” here for the doctors is to say “new stands of the virus”. To say that they have to have known that those strands were not there before and they only have “data” for a few decades and limited as well because they can’t test every corner of the world to be certain those strands don’t already exist somewhere. They have only their suggestions and no evidence and their suggestions serve to sell vaccines on mass to governments. The virus story is just a money making machine.  

Another argument that is used is that HPV is implicated in many other cancers which are considered “associated cancers” because of human sexual activities. So for instance they cite that HPV is responsible for

• 90% of anal cancers
• 65% of vaginal cancers
• 50% of vulva cancers
• 35% of penile cancers
• 60% of oropharyngeal (throat, tongue and tonsils) cancers.

These figures give credibility where there is no real evidence. The assumption made is that people engage in oral sex so it is reasonable that there is a viral infection in the mouth. So there is, but that does not translate to “the cause of cancer”. Another statistic is that anal cancer is 17 to 31 times higher among gay and bisexual men than among heterosexual men. But according to some homosexual men, a majority of homosexual men do not engage in anal sex. Furthermore there are possibly more heterosexual men that engage in anal sex than there are homosexuals. A person engaging in anal sex, who gets anal cancer, is not evidence that the cancer is caused by a viral infection. There are plenty of people who have never had anal sex and who have no HPV infection in their anus who get anal cancer.

Some doctors claim that some cancers such as cervical cancer is a “silent killer” because there are no symptoms. One only needs to look at the symptoms that they recognize to appreciate that they do not regard the person stress as a factor, nor do they consider any unusual emotional reactivity as a symptom. And the symptoms they do recognize are “late symptoms”, which means the cancer has developed!

1. Vaginal bleeding after having had sex
2. Pain during sex
3. Pain in the pelvic area
4. Unusual discharge from the vagina
5. bleeding between menstrual periods which is abnormal
6. unusually heavy bleeding during the menstrual period
7. urinating more often than normal.

By the time these symptoms arise the doctor is guaranteed work! But if the early symptoms are notice and addressed by the patient themselves, they need never pay the doctor a visit.

 Internal factors supposedly causing cancer.

The immune system.

The immune system is designed to defend the body. The defense is against foreign and dangerous substances that might find their way into the body. These foreign substances include living matter such as microorganisms, parasites and transplanted organs or tissues and inanimate matter including such things as asbestos. The foreign substances that are living invaders are attacked and killed and the debris cleared away. The non-living matter, which cannot be removed, is in a sense quarantined because the body may build a cell case to surround and contain it.

Doctors claim that cancer cells normally appear in the body and are normally killed by the immune system. There is no evidence for such a claim! Cancer cells, as all other cells, may undergo apoptosis, called programmed death but that happens for the same reason as for any other cell, which is if the cell is damaged. In opposition to the doctor’s claim there is plenty of evidence that the immune system helps the cancer. Typical immune system cells are sometimes found with and around precancerous and cancer cell masses. Indeed cancer masses are largely made up of normal immune system cells. In fact the cancer cells are also immune system products, only that they are not the usual types.

Two types of immune system cells that are found are macrophages and neutrophils, which are white blood cells that ingest and kill microorganisms and other foreign cells. With the presence of these cells there are sometime ulcerations of healthy tissue associated with cancer. Healthy tissue is being attacked by immune cells while the cancer is not attacked. To explain this doctors say that these white blood cells have malfunctioned. These immune cells are also involved in apoptosis, so it explains their presence if healthy tissue is being attack. There will be damaged cells in the area that need to be cleared away. When they see these immune system cells present and they don’t kill the cancer cells. The unharmed cancer cells are engaged in rapid cell growth. So doctors say that the immune cells have become dormant. And where they see ulceration of the tissues they start to talk about autoimmune malfunctions /disorder as being coincident with cancer; they say that the immune cells have lost their ability to tell the difference between the “self cells” and the “non-self cells” so the body attacks itself. And even more dramatically they are claiming that radiation and chemotherapy treatments may damage normal cells and immune system cells but the cancer cells are able to prevent themselves from being damaged and killed or that more cells become cancers so the treatment makes things worse.

Look at the way genes and mediators of apoptosis (cell death) are named. The very naming suggests a medical story is being pushed. One of the major mediators of apoptosis is a protein which carries signals locally between cells. It is produced by active macrophages, which ingest and kill cells. This protein has been named tumor necrosis factor or TNF. There are two receptors on the cell to which this protein can bind. Depending on where it binds the cell can be signaled to begin cell death processes, inflammatory response or cell survival. Why call it a tumor necrosis factor? It has nothing to do with tumors? They claim that there is an abnormal production of this mediator. And having made that assumption they go on to talk about a “link” to cancer and autoimmune malfunctions or diseases. Calling the mediator TNF only helps them describe biology in a way that justifies their theories of physical causes for cancer and other diseases. If the mediators that they claim should kill cancer cells are dormant then what else? Why they are malfunctioning! The ideas and beliefs that may cause a person’s body to react in a particular way is not considered and even treated as abhorrence and why not, it threatens their jobs. A cancer patient feeds many health professionals and it is not over when the cancer is gone. They are “monitored” over years and years with tests of every variety. Heaven forbid that the patient can heal themselves or not get sick in the first place!

 Bile acids that they find in the colon

Doctors assume that if they find high levels of bile in the colon then it must be due to a high fat diet. Presumably they expect that there would be a whole lot of bile left over from digestion processes if you eat a lot of fat. It is only suggestion. Eskimos, for centuries, have eaten extremely high fat diets, but only in recent years have they manifest cancer. If it was left over bile from digestion then it would have been there all along, for thousands of years and never cause those people to get colon cancer.

You will find that colon cancer is associated with grief or despair. Both of these are states in which skeletal muscle metabolism is significantly lowered and the digestive system activated. This happens by a high PNS tone. A high PNS tone is also associated with many processes in the body, including the release of bile for digestion of fats. So you will find bile acids in the colon of a person who has had no fat to eat, if they are grieving and that grief is being exploited by toxic people related to the person grieving. In a cheat it is accompanied by fear as well, so the body is in conflict to some extent. Grief, owing to a high PNS tone, stimulates the digestive system and the bowel in particular. It is used in a cheat to fool the person that the vague images that are mentally presented, often of “being gutted” or “having a gutful” etc., will be convincing. The images cause mirror neurons in the brain to become activated but not enough to cause significant activity in the bowel. However if the person is grieving or feels despair then there will already by activity in the bowel. The activity due to the mirror neuron will be wrongly attributed to all the activity in the bowel. So the personal self, which includes the body, reacts as if the imagery is causing all the high activity in the bowel. An idea in mind is upheld with confidence so the idea becomes a belief. Unwittingly their body may build a cell barrier for protection from a seeming aggression or aggressor, which of course is unnecessary because it is all only a cheat and the imagery rubbish.

The medical explanations take what is seen in the body, at the organ, tissue and cellular level but without taking the person and their beliefs into account; So all of the above supposed “causes of cancer” cannot account for the reality. Cancer is a huge “growth industry”. Cancer has existed since ancient times. The Egyptian record incidence of breast cancer as far back as 1600 BC and the Greeks recorded several types of cancer from around 400 BC. However the incidence of cancer was tiny until the industrial revolution. Since about 1900, when the industrial revolution was well underway and people lived in cities in close proximity to one another, this incidence began to rise. In the last 20 years it has absolutely exploded and rapidly increasing. There are no physical factors to account for these statistics. Everything that is being blamed for causing cancer has been around for thousands of years.

Doctors and medical researchers misrepresent the true nature of disease. In reality there is no disease. It is damage taken owing to the way a person reacts somatically to ideas that are presented mentally and which are nothing more than suggestion! You are NOT a machine and you do have the power to make changes in your body, even at the cellular level, affecting genes and all you need do is recognize that some of the belief you hold are bogus. Once you discard the old beliefs and replace them with directives to the Universe, you can get your body to heal itself.. easy!

Epigenetics changes the picture.

You can consider the new science of epigenetics as a guiding light but treat it too with caution. The old science said that genes controlled life. It was considered that the human being was a product of their genes. Genes were thought of as dictating everything about a person, what they say and how they act because it was argued genes determine a person’s traits, which meant everything about the person physically and emotionally was determined by their genes. Your are your DNA.

Then it was discovered that the environment in which identical cells are placed causes them to change into different sorts of cells. So it turns out that “the contractor” or “the one who reads” the DNA controls what happens and not the DNA itself. This came at the time of the new physics, which says that everything might appears solid but in reality it is made of energy. So the argument is made that if thoughts are energy vibrations (they gotta be ahh?? If the brain is all energy and thoughts are in the brain then they got to be energy too!) then thoughts will influence atoms, which are the building blocks of the body and also made of energy. Under this schema the mind and the beliefs are considered to create a ripple effect in the energy that “turns on” cancer cells. I reject these conclusion not only because they are ridiculous but because they try to marry up the old concepts of cancer and disease with the new discoveries in a way that suits doctors. If it was true then all thoughts would cause ripples on the body, even so it could still be suggested that different thoughts cause different ripples and some ripples switch on cancer cells. And of course the thoughts are energy / cause ripple effects means the person is responsible for the ripple wrecking thoughts, while the toxic people get a New Age medical cover! It’s bullshit in my opinion.

You will find that thoughts are the perceptions of other people’s hateful suggestions. This needs to be clearly realized because a person cannot be held responsible for the content of thoughts that are being thought by and mentally addressed to the person they target. You need to appreciate that toxic people are criminals and as such are rubbish.

 It might sound harsh to call criminals rubbish but consider, the criminal is either put in jail and “throw away the key”, i.e., for life, or they are executed. Either way the society treats them as rubbish. In particular toxic people who gang up and prey on other people and thus on society have NO worth. Innocent people are victimized both by the toxic subculture while the medical industry cover the criminals and profit from the damage. The medical propaganda is that all thoughts are created in the brain and hence the person thinking/ perceiving those thoughts is responsible for creating them. In understanding that this is false you are halfway to arresting the disease!

It is vitally important to realize how thoughts are presented and what effects can be created, especially in making thoughts seemingly subliminal for the person targeted.

 A bit about thoughts and ESP.

Thoughts are not energy. And while there may be electrochemical activity in the brain in the process of thinking or making thoughts conscious, the real place of thoughts is at the level of the mind. And here too language, whether intended that way or not, is deceptive. The perception of ideas, particularly between people who are relationally entangled, is called telepathy or extrasensory perception ESP. The first term in particular gives the idea that a thought is transmitted from one brain to another over distance. It is easy enough to do an experiment that disproves this concept. Thoughts are not physical. Energy is still a phenomenon of the physical reality. I prefer to call the phenomenon “direct mental perception” because it does not pertain to the physical reality. There is a collective mind and a personal mind. Each person’s personal mind is private but all people also interact on a common platform, the collective mind.

It is easy enough to prove direct mental perception for yourself. Just look calmly at the person in front of you so that you don’t give any hint away as to what you are thinking. Then mentally address them, speak to them in your mind and mentally say something offensive such as “you’re a stupid rotten idiot”. You will see their reaction as they perceive the offensive thoughts. You can then tell them it was an experiment and ask them to write down what they perceived in mind and you write down what you had mentally said and then compare notes. You will find that they perceived your mental address accurately.

Medical scientists discredit ESP either by:

1. The way they do experiments. All experiments on ESP are double blinded and thereby they never examine ESP within relationship. And with the ridiculous claim the researcher scientists make is that they need to keep themselves honest! If physicists had the same attitude then the phenomena that led to the development of quantum mechanics would not have been observed.
2. The way they interpret experiments. Medical researchers believe in “independent observers”. They believe that it is possible to put a conscious living being under the microscope and not affect them in conducting an experiment. I guess they think that double blinding takes care of this too. Physicists know there is no such thing as an independent observer. They need to tie the results back to the observer to make them meaningful!
3. The way that others aim to repeat the experiments. Even in the few occasions where ESP experiments and their results are published they can still be discredited. All they need is some willing researchers to claim they can’t repeat the experiments. That in other words they do the experiments and can’t get the same results. And how easy to do.. using ESP and giving the subjects “a bum steer”.

ESP is hated by doctors because it destroys Evolutionary Biology and at the same time exposes the real causes of disease. I do not believe the misinformation to the public is some accident. I have seen plenty of occasions where toxic doctors privately use ESP in foul play. So they are well aware of its reality. Denying ESP covers the criminal activity of the toxic chief offender, who is extremely likely to be a next of kin and the toxic mobs, who together play foul games that leads to disease. ESP is of critical importance because without it there is no foul game play and without foul play and people’s ignorance, there is no disease. I discuss ESP or direct mental perception on my Google blog at http://stressanddisease.blogspot.com.au/2012/06/esp-scientific-posted-on-december-29.html if you are interested to read more about it.

There is no “mental software” being “downloaded into your brain”, whether in early life or at any time. It is toxic rubbish in a person’s life that is current and problematic but only while the person is ignorant of the cheats. By knowing about the cheats so as to remain unmoved by the ideas knowing the ideas are only perceptions, disease can be avoided. I have begun to document the cheats that I have seen on this blog at:  http://kyrani99book1.wordpress.com/chapter-1/

Maybe we could call thoughts information but even the word “information” is still problematic. Information means facts and knowledge and thoughts are not necessarily facts or knowledge. What to call thoughts? Thoughts can be perceptions or they can be selections or knowledge, reasoning or opinion or suggestions. Maybe we could call thoughts probable selections made from the universal pool of possibilities. And probable because they are likely to manifest some reality but only if they are accepted.  

How the medical scientists involve epigenetics.

It is now accepted by some scientists that a person’s thinking can cause disease and it can cause healing, but how they believe these come about can vary enormously AND none of what they have to say is feasible. Some scientists believe that while you have control over your body.. potentially, BUT… you are not really in control!

They claim that 95% of the mind’s “programming” or software was “downloaded” in the first 5 or 6 years of life. And worse still it was given to you by others! What a bummer! To me it smacks of doctors wanting to keep themselves in the driver’s seat where a person’s health is concerned. I don’t subscribe to this way of thinking at all and indeed I have found something very different.

How epigenetic effects can be explained.

People don’t “live in the past” and they don’t “live in the future”. The reality is that everyone lives in the present. Even if a person upholds ideas about the past or future, they uphold those ideas in the present. There is however another problem and that does affect the level of consciousness and that is that most people use some sort of coping habit to try and avoid ideas that are troubling. I have written about coping habits on my main blog at:

http://kyrani99.wordpress.com/2012/01/01/comfort-zones-coping-habits/

Basically the changes in consciousness involve physical changes in the body, either to raise or lower metabolism. So really it is the personal self that is diminished. I suspect this has something to do with heightened or lowered activity in the brain respectively, which changes the environment of neurons and there would be epigenetic effects that may affect brain chemistry. But those effects are not lasting because if you get rid of the coping habit you recover full consciousness.

The important thing to say here is that there is no “software” running in your brain at any level let alone at a low level. You are always in control. There is no evidence “low level software running in the subconscious”! You can see, by the way the different cheats work that personal self has to be moved to react otherwise there’s no dice! Toxic people cannot act directly on your body. An idea that is not conscious, even momentarily, cannot be used in a cheat because the personal self has to be moved to react to the idea. The personal self is the conscious part. There is no unconscious or subconscious part of a personal self. There is the level of spiritual being but that is a whole different state of affairs and not what we need to discuss here. There is an issue though that needs discussion and that is an illusion of diminished consciousness.

The illusion of diminished consciousness.

Our insight is part of consciousness. We are conscious of information gained through the senses but we are also conscious of ideas gained through direct mental perception, i.e., insightfully. There are methods used to change the intensity of perception. The victim is still insightful but too little and too fleeting for the victim to be sufficiently aware of the images presented in mind or the suggestions made. There are things you can do to improve your perception and learning to meditate is very useful because a key factor is to become more aware of what you’re doing as your doing it. The more aware you remain during everyday life the better you become at spotting problematic perceptions.

The two basic methods involve:

1. attenuating ESP or
2. amplifying otherwise low level ESP.  

A strongly related person, such as a next of kin, may seek to “attenuate” the level of ESP in order to be able to present ideas more subtly. This is done with the help of another toxic person who is only trivially related to the victim. The effect has to do with mental addressing. So for instance the toxic next of kin can engage in a conversation with another person, who is trivially related to the victim or targeted person, so as to indirectly talk to the victim. In fact they are talking about the victim. In that way the targeted person will be less perceptive of what is being said. For most people this is not enough to know what is being said. However it may be enough for the person to react (somatically) but the effect is weak. I found that “the management of the body”, is far easier and changes in the body far less than if the ideas were normally perceived. So you can irritate a person but you can’t really make them sick. Thus a combination is used. So suggestion about images is made more conscious but the images less conscious. You can however abolish all effects in the body, just by knowing the cheats. You can also uphold ideas to counteract what you only barely perceive by affirming that ideas of low intensity are only suggestions.

So being mentally addressed directly or not gives a different effect. This can be overcome but it requires me to explain other matters first and it is not essential to explain on this blog so I will be doing that elsewhere.   

Alternatively a person trivially related to the victim can use a next of kin, who is strongly related to the targeted person, to “amplify” perception. So that where they could not get the victim to perceive their mental addresses, e.g., thoughts or words, with the use of a toxic next of kin their thoughts can be perceived. The toxic next of kin thinks of the victim while listening to the spoken words, thus in a sense creating a direct line to the victim. Thus the victim will be perceptive of the weakly related person’s mental address via the next of kin’s mental connection. This method allows the trivially related person to gain the amplification they need. This method is commonly used when the chief offender is not a next of kin.

Different cheats are utilized to gain a perception of the victim’s thoughts. Briefly a strongly related person can, under certain conditions, think of the other person and gain a mental connection enough to perceive some of their thinking. And again a weakly related person can use a strongly related person, such as toxic next of kin, to help them gain the same advantage.

Commonly a person is threatened in many different ways to enable the offenders to gain more perception of their thought world. The threats are made indirectly and aim to cause the victim to become agreeable. This is not the place to discuss these methods further either. I will be doing that on other blogs. But it is important to mention them here to appreciate that far from double blinding, which is used in medical experiments to supposedly test ESP, in real life closely related people such as toxic next of kin and threats are used to amplify ESP.

All of the above methods show that the notion of unconscious or subconscious is erroneous in real terms. All of these problems compound the effects of cheats. A person who is ignorant of the cheats is caught in a snare, particularly if they are mislead by medical misinformation as well about ideas created in the brain. So a cunning combination of moderate, weak and briefly presented ideas could cause that person to react somatically as to build a cell mass in their body, i.e., cancer. And when the causes of cancer are being presented as physical, then the patient (victim) is not going to investigate the ideas and find their own solution.

To fully appreciate the epigenetic effects it is also important to see the power politics that take place. So I will describe a worst case scenario where let’s say a toxic cop is involved and the victim is an enemy of the toxic subculture. The victim might be a scientists researching ESP or successfully healing people using ideas or prayer or a politician that’s being too enthusiastic about fighting corruption and can’t be “persuaded” to give up politics. Cancer is among the many means that can be used in anyone of these sorts of case because public ignorance means the public’s suspicions are not aroused.

The first thing the toxic subculture will do is to seek out who among “their people”, i.e., toxic people can help. Some of the toxic players will be among the victim’s next of kin. If they don’t have any toxic next of kin then the toxic mob will “generate some”. For instance if the guy is not married, then the “fall in love at first sight cheat” can be used, so suddenly he’s met the woman of his dreams or so it will appear! A new spouse can very quickly, in the space of a few months, gain a very favourable next of kin position, meaning that a strong and trusted relationship can be quickly built. Other toxic players will be “inside the system”. If the person is a scientists then other scientists or doctors etc., are used. If they are a politician toxic police might be employed in the foul play. If they belong to some commercial organization then key figures, who are toxic inside that organisation or organizations that are key will be used, as for instance suppliers of bulk goods.

Most people are not aware of the toxic sub-culture so they do not guess that several people in several different areas of their life may be part of a plot against them. They may be betrayed by some of these toxic people as to trust them with personal information. Or the victim may be influenced by being directly but cunningly mentally addressed but believe it is just ideas that have suddenly occurred to them. If the victim is not suspicious and believes that all his or her thoughts are created by his or her brain then the cheating’s easy. The reason for the chief offender’s involvement is either to gain power and influence over the victim or to kill them. The rest of the toxic people are involved for the pleasure they get from seeing and /or insightfully feeling the victim’s suffering.  If the targeted person/ victim is guarded then the toxic mob will resort to an attenuation method. Let’s say the victim buys into the medical story about all thoughts created by the brain to make it simple.

The “give ‘em get cancer cheat”.

I will say right off the bat that no one can give another person cancer. This is talk that toxic people engage in but it is not real. I have described the cheat used in an earlier post but I will do this again to add in the medical picture. First the offenders must discretely pose danger so as to cause the targeted person to feel fear. At the same time make mental suggestions are made, so the targeted person is faced with ideas that are coincident with their fear. The ideas presented feel menacing because the fear appears to be associated with the idea. This is the nature of the power politics of the foul games.

If we take away the fear, we can see that a strongly related person can present ideas but that is not enough to cause the personal self to react.

Aside from the fact that the targeted person may become suspicious, an idea on its own doesn’t carry any weight. The person may think about it and come to the conclusion that it might be imaginary or wrong. If however the idea has an added component of fear, then the targeted person may think about it with concern. So fear is a very necessary ingredient and to generate fear real danger is needed. My late toxic husband said, “toxic people use a “gci”, a gun-carrying individual” and he explained “the term was used because it catered for both types”. When I asked him what he meant, he gave a wry smile and then said “crims carry guns but so do cops”. So what he was telling me is that danger can be posed either with the use of a criminal carrying a gun or a corrupt cop, who lawfully carries a gun.

The addition of a criminal does two things. Firstly there is real danger posed, which causes the person to feel fear. Secondly it creates a disparity that moves the inequality to oppression. However an individual may still entertain the notion that if the danger they feel can be identified, that the criminal seen and starts to give them trouble then they could still call the police and get some help.

If the criminal used is a corrupt cop then a huge disparity can be created because the individual thinks that they have no recourse for their protection though they won’t know why. The violence they face comes from “inside the system”. And they may have toxic others inside the system standing against them too. But even in the simplest case the chief offender has a toxic mob behind them who include people in the victim’s life that the victim has not guessed are enemies. So a huge disparity is created, whether there is a criminal or a corrupt cop involved.

Under conditions of oppression and danger, an idea presented will seem to have enormous force because the fear seems to be greater. Oppression makes a person feel more vulnerable and less able to cope. And if the oppressive force is unseen or unrecognized then it is even worse than visible, known oppression. These are not some “psychological conditions”. There are real bodily conditions involved. In part a coping habit can be more forcefully invoked. So the fear, which is a mobilization of the body, either for external or internal defence will add to the conditions in the body. So if the person’s body is conflicted by a coping habit then the conflict will be greater. If the coping habit overloads the vital organs, especially the heart, then the overload is greater. So the fear will be seen not only evidence for the idea but strong evidence. And there is another consideration. The conflict or overload in the body due to a coping habit is enhanced by fear that is due to external danger. If the danger is deemed to be internal then a lesser problem for the vital organs arises. So while the idea itself will point to internal danger, the person is likely to accept this if it “feels right”. We assume that something feels right or that our reasoning is correct if we move to a more comfortable place in ourselves, which really means in our body. The gut feeling is bodily as well as mental but so too is the “feeling right”. It is bodily as well as thought or reasoning. So if the body is in a better disposition on accepting that the danger is internal then the person is likely to accept that there is truth to their thinking or reasoning. In fact it is only experiencing a lesser problem in the body and not for any real reason. In reality of course the fear and the idea are unrelated.

For a cancer cheat both fear and anger are always present but not always obvious. Sometimes the person does not recognize fear and anger reactivity other than “a hot feeling”. Danger needs to be pinpointed before the body moves to decline or amplify the immune system response. If the danger is perceived to be external, then the immune system will go into decline as the body mobilizes for action. If the danger is believed to be internal then the immune system will increase its activity in the area where the danger is perceived. We need to distinguish here the normal working of the immune system. There are trillions of immune cells and products throughout the body, which work in harmony. So if some foreign microbes or cells are detected in one area of the body, immune cells and products can be brought to the area, as much as needed. However if there is an idea, which depicts danger in a specific area, and that idea is accompanied by fear, which is taken to be evidence for the idea of danger, then the immune system can be put into high alert. Even without the anger the person feels oppressed and struggling against some nebulous force in the “inner realm”. If they are also angered then they become aggressive so a very vigorous effort or struggle is launched. The immune system can be caused to very quickly and aggressively bring immune cells and products into the area. This is an inflammatory response that erroneously targets the area with no regard to the fact that there is nothing foreign. It doesn’t check for “self” and “non-self” cells. It just fires away with cytotoxic attack at what ever is there.. yeah healthy cells! It is clear evidence that the biology is purpose driven and not a machine that has malfunctioned. The attack damages and destroys healthy cells. Inflammatory responses that attack healthy cells are characteristic of some precancerous and cancerous conditions. This is not enough to cause cancer. All that has happened here is that the immune system has been erroneously put into action.

For the next stage to take place, that is changes to stem cells as to create barrier and /or resistance cells, the area in question needs to be also activated and concurrent with the fear and the ideas presented in mind.

To be continued

Distortions of Meaning

Distortions of Meaning.

If you are a humane person you do have free will and the ability to consciously make selections about their reality, even in the absence of external coercion, because there is no external coercion that has authority. I am not talking here about the usual social structures. For instance a police officer has authority to investigate a crime but if a person has not transgressed then there is no authority to interfere with that person. I am talking here about a person’s rights as an existence in the universe. There are rights that stand absolute and no social structure has authority over them. Such rights do extend to the natural world and the social environment. The selections are the causal processes of thoughts and are directives to the Universe but only if they are consistent with Truth. Evil has no ability to make such selections. Harm is done in one of two ways, either by evil or by good. Evil cannot harm directly. Thus they look to present ideas or distort meanings as to cause another person to uphold ideas that become their selections. These selections then may give rise to harmful bodily reactions. The other way is “lawful harm” and it can only be done by humane (good) people. This applies in cases where there are selections made by evil people with the intent to adversely influence another person and/or their children or property. So a humane person can use the consequences set up in the universe of such selections for the purpose of self-defence or the defence of another. These consequences become selections that override the evil mindset. An evil person can be hunted down and destroyed at the level of Mind. Mind is both Void and Clarity together. And within it selections have a ripple effect. The Universes together (this and other universes) exist in The Mind of God. (Most Christians think in terms of a Holy Spirit but the true translation from the original Greek is Mind and not Spirit or worse still Ghost.). Humane people are essentially free because they are not locked into a mindset and thus have the ability to note the ideas and knowing they are mere suggestion can then discharge them and replace them with beneficial ones. To try and overcome the freedom of humane people, evil people try to distort meaning. To try and distort meaning they commonly use what they call hash or what they try to justify as “nuances of meaning”. So they may try to use a person’s prayer or give their positive ideas a negative meaning.

Hash is words and phrases, sometimes sentences.. “chopped and recooked”

and of course these are nothing more than suggestions and just garbage but you need to be aware of that.

There are many ways in which hash is created. A few common ways that I have seen are:

1. To chop a word into parts as for instance the word “toxicology” was used at one point against me and I suspect these were toxic doctors. The hash garbage might have be “toxic c/o (care of) logi” which is an attempt to say “toxic care of word” or “the words taken care of by toxics” because they were suggesting “toxicology reports”. Of course they have no authority. It is mere suggestion. The word reports might have been meant as a verb as well as a noun. The last part logi has origin from Greek meaning either “word” or “idea”. So the hash garbage was an attempt to say “it’s the toxic doctor’s say since toxic doctors get to make the report at autopsy. They got to kill me first and it’s now more than 15 years of trying! A word is sometimes hashed in two languages if the person is bilingual. So toxicology hash garbage could have also been attempted as “toxic: co (for company, so children, pets, friends) low gh” (gh means earth, so idea of dead). This is a way of threatening a person’s children, pets or friends etc. BUT “toxic co(mpany)” is the evil subculture! So “toxic: co low gh”  backfires! Note that the words or phrases used are all general and the meaning, which needs to be affected, is mental. So it is generally not a good idea to use hash in any counter attacks, unless you can confidently fix the meaning.
2. Another way in which they try to use words is by using synonyms. So for example they might suggest the word “pregnant” and that word is commonly used synonymously with “expecting”. The word “expecting” is general and for meaning there needs to be specificity! The words “I’m expecting it to happen” has no meaning. But “I’m expecting the fall of evil people because it is written, i.e., there are directives set in the universe” has meaning! Words with similar sounds are also used, as for example the word “morning” has the similar sound as the word “mourning”. So if a person uses the word morning in their prayer for instance they have to be careful their meaning is consistent with what they want. A good way to overcome some of this is to use pictures, so it is best to create a prayer in writing and illustrated. It’s not necessary to be an artist, stick figures and simple shapes is enough but a more fancy presentation can be made by creating a collage of pictures cut out of a magazine. Basically seeing pictures enables a person to uphold the meaning they intend in mind. I strongly suspect evil people use pictures to try and create the distortions. So pictures are a way of overcoming any such attempted distortions of meaning through mental suggestion.
3. The distortion of grammar so that a phrase or sentence has a different meaning is a way of trying to create a so-called nuance of meaning. If a person is bi-lingual then the sound of a word in one language is used for a word with the same sound in the other language, which can change the meaning if they are not aware of it. So for instance a person’s counter of something that might have been suggested might be “it has nothing to do with me”. One attempt was to change this to “It has nothing; to do with me” to try and say that I have nothing and that this nothing had to do with me. A good way to overcome this is to change the wording so to say “the evil people’s suggestions have nothing to do with me as they have no relevance to me and my property”. If the person is bi-lingual then the enemy might translate the words and then hash.  The word in Greek for “does not” is “den” which has an almost identical pronunciation with the word “then” and of course this changes the meaning. So the Greek with the English word becomes “then has to do with me”. A way around it is to use positives rather than a negative. “Suggestions are null and void” or “I reject all suggestions”
4. Another way to attempt to distort meaning is by the use of grammatical stops. So for instance the sentence “I reject the evil suggestions” had been presented back to me as “I reject. The evil suggestions.” At the source, this is most likely spoken by one person and listened to by another person, who is more closely related to the targeted person. If spoken they can more easily leave a barely noticeable pause after the word “reject” to indicate a full stop. So as an idea at the “perceiving end” by the targeted person, it is not immediately recognizable. But once you realize it you perceive the attempted distortion every time. Again reword it and use a picture. I reject the suggestion of the evil people. And put it up on your wall. I further stated that this is “a sentence and they tried to suggest that a sentence was a punishment assigned for being guilty.. of opposing the evil people!  So one needs to go further to say that it is a set of words that is complete in itself”. It is not to convince the other party but to make the meaning clear in your own mind because it is this meaning that they attempt to distort. Another way they use gramma changes is to use signatures. So for example to try and distort the meaning of the phrase “the evil people perish” gramma stops were used. With a colon the phrase becomes “the evil people: perish!”. Thus “perish” becomes a suggestion made by the evil people. And when that didn’t work they turned to “perish the thought”! A picture of evil people in a pool of their blood in a mass grave being ploughed under, brings to mind the meaning. 

To someone unaware of the hash it can be a serious matter because how you react to ideas depends on meaning. Sometimes not understanding the hash and attributing a different meaning from what was attempted can be a saving grace but at other times not realizing the hash can be hazardous. There is a tendency to think that meaning is just some mental construct that humans have devised but that is not so. It is a fundamental aspect of the Universe because it is tied to truth. I have seen many cases where even animals were affected and affected because they had to have, incredible as it seems, perception and understanding of meaning. Animals don’t understand language. However to be affected by hash distortions of meaning in the mind of someone interacting with them means that meaning can’t be something humans thought up and created. We construct words and we talk about giving those words meaning but in reality this is round the wrong way. We perceive meaning and construct words to depict those meanings. So meaning is something fundamental. For instance there was hash of the Greek word for “egg”. The sound was hashed because it sounded like the English “ ‘ave go ”. The meaning of “have go” was aimed at meaning if you eat it (then) you die. This was enough for the animal, which previously ate the egg with relish, not to want to even be near it, let alone eat it. When I recognized and addressed the hash and took the meaning back to “egg” the animal once again would eat the egg. In another case blue berries was hashed to blue.. buries and it again affected certain animals that previously ate them. And these are just two examples. I could cite many, many more. If meaning was not fundamental and outside of language, and if the mind were not a non-physical reality, then it would be impossible for such things to happen. The above is not an exhaustive list. There are many different ways in which evil people look to deceive humane people in order to cause them to react in a way that would hurt them. The important thing to appreciate is that all hash and indeed all of evil suggestions are general so it is just a matter of recognizing that and making the prayer wording specific and supported with pictures AND keep them private.

Hash shows that toxic people are “the enemy” in every sense of the word. They are hell bent on seeing another person harmed. Think of an two year old with cancer and what shit it takes to repeatedly present ideas to harass that child and drive it to the grave. They must be treated as enemies. This brings me to ideas conveyed in Christianity, in the main but also in other religions that has to do with enemies and which I strongly believe are corruptions of the holy texts. One can well understand people like Dawkins screaming about religion when we see what corruptions there are. However this is politics, the politics of the evil subculture. Evil people have at times gained positions within the church from which to yield power and doing harm by using corruptions as a stick. It is not the religion that is at fault but corrupt people. Religion is only the belief in and worship of God.

Religion never denies you the right to self defence. One key and dangerous idea in the Christian faith is to “love enemies” and to “forgive enemies”. I heard one Greek Orthodox priest claim that “if you don’t forgive the person who transgresses against you then you go to hell while the offenders go to heaven”. What! I later found that he was a paedophile, which explains his self-serving rubbish. I want to make it clear here that I am NOT saying “never forgive”. Forgiving another person, who has wronged you, whether you know them or not, may be appropriate and in many cases forgiveness is a good thing. However one needs to discriminate who they may forgive and who not to forgive. Not all enemies fall into the same category. An enemy is someone who is either actively opposed or hostile towards you but there may be many reasons for their stance. Not all enemies are evil. It may be appropriate in some cases to forgive an enemy. My caution is that the statement in the Bible is general. It does not discriminate. Evil people should never be forgiven.

Most people consider to forgive means to stop being angry or resentful towards an offender. However that definition is far short of what it means. A person who faces an injustice issue needs to find some resolution to stop being angry. The Greek word for forgiveness has the meaning of “accommodating (the offender) on common ground”.. This can only happen when the offender has confessed the offence, admitted guilt and shown genuine remorse and the willingness to make up for the wrong somehow and by their future actions show that they have changed. Far from any of this an evil people looks to use the offence that they have committed to continually harass the person mentally. They may profess that they are sorry but at the same time repeatedly present ideas of the offence so as to trouble the victim. Forgiveness is most certainly NOT “something one does for themselves”. This explains why some people get past the anger they feel and others can’t even though they have made an earnest effort to forgive.

To forgive someone of an offence and accommodate them on a common ground the crime and the consequences of the crime need to be addressed. In the language of the Bible the consequences are called debts, which is not a good way of thinking about them. Evil deeds are in a different class to other crimes because they create three consequences. Evil people’s crimes may appear to be against individuals but when we look at the big picture we find that there are mobs of evil people who stand against freedom, truth and justice. They are certainly about cruelty and destruction but they are also about subjugation of the entire community of the humane and dictatorship by underhanded means. And anyone’s actions that collude with evil people and their actions are themselves equally offending. Evil actions are also against God. The main reason is that evil people blaspheme. Blasphemy is not about being irreverent about God and sacred things, which is the usual definition. It is about misrepresenting Truth. All foul play of evil people is dependent on distorting meanings, using hash and various ways of trying to misrepresent truth. Thus the offence is an offence against the Mind of God or the Universe. Blasphemy is not forgiven. Forgiving an evil offender for their hateful actions only disadvantages the victim because it negates the consequence that applies to them directly and which can be used against the evil people. The consequence can be used to counter attack the offenders. So evil is in a different category to what we normally call sin.

Christians quoting the “Lord’s Prayer” need to be aware that there is a lot of ambiguity when it comes to what is meant. If you read the original Greek then the words are “release from or let go of the debt” but it is not clear as to whether this means a debt of money, the interest on money loaned or something else. If you read the Modern Greek then the words are “forgiveness of sin”. This is interpretive and not mere translation; but even here the words have many meanings. The word “sin” in Greek can mean “missing the mark”, a failure, especially in doing something, or it can mean a bad action but it is unclear as to what constitutes a bad action because there is no word for evil action in Greek. 

It is very dangerous for a person to forgive an evil person of their evil action for two reasons. One is, as I mentioned above, that the debt can be used to ward off or counter attack the enemy. So letting off the offender means that the person has lost their defence. The other however is even more serious. Forgiveness gives the enemy the opportunity they are looking for. Evil people are liars. To give you some idea let me quote one evil person, who say to me “I’m sorry I won’t do that again.” I found that he had almost immediately offended again. When I pointed out what he had said he told me that the “that” in the sentence (I won’t do that again) only referred to the previous type of offence and that this was now a different offence altogether. So he was not saying he wouldn’t offend again but that he would, only with different offences.

To understand the huge disadvantage appreciate that anger is a large part of cancer. It may be obvious but it may also be hidden behind irritability, moodiness or frustration. A lot of people think in terms of “I’m taking it out on him or her (commonly about their spouse) and don’t appreciate that they are angry for a reason but that that reason is not obvious. An evil person will use what ever they can to cause the person to react but the weapon is ideas. Ideas depict issues. So even if they have said they are sorry and are ot genuine then there is an issue of betrayal that can and is used by evil people to cause anger in the victim. If the offender has asked for forgiveness and are not genuine then it makes it very hard for the victim to appreciate the source of their anger and how to overcome it because the offender if they are evil is not the only one involved but a whole mob as well. If you add to that the medical misinformation about ideas created in the brain and ESP as magical thinking then the victim is in a quagmire. Only with the truth can they emerge to understand what they are up against and how to deal with the issues behind the anger.

Some people argue that “forgiveness breaks the bond with the aggressors”. If you think about it you find there is no bond between an aggressor and a cancer victim but there is relationship. This is because the aggressor is either a relative or other associate of the victim. The claim of a bond is commonly made by people who are themselves evil and who often hide behind a fake public face of benevolence. A bond infers agreement and there is no such thing in a crime. Indeed the opposite is true. The victim resents and rejects the offender. If you forgive the aggressor then you have brought them to some extent into an improved relationship that the evil person will seek to use; so forgiveness becomes to some extent a bond. The offender may seem willing to say that they are sorry and if they are next of kin, they are going to quote “family” in a way that tries to make the victim guilty or bad if they won’t accept their fake apology. But whether the victim forgives them or not, the evil people will try to bring the matter to mind repeatedly to trouble the victim. If they forgive then ideas of “fool” and the injustice that had been done might be brought to mind or if they don’t forgive then ideas of “you’re bad” might be presented in mind and the attempt to manufacture guilt. This causes the victim to feel the injustice over and over again. A person can be made even angrier than what they would have been without the added betrayal. Your aim, which is to get rid of the anger, won’t be served by letting the evil person off. You are best to see the theatre of war and as a warrior would, use the situation to your best advantage. All you need to do is realize that ideas are the issue and those ideas are only hateful desires which have no foundation. Evil people’s suggestions are null and void. And the rules of evil people are bullshit. Evil people have no authority, no permission no rights and no power. Make them feel their powerlessness each time and at the same time realize your rights and power.

Evil people use a cheat to try and overcome a person’s rejections of them and their suggestions. In this cheat they make their suggestions and at the same time increase slightly the level of danger. So for instance if they have a line of sight through a window, they may then grab a gun momentarily in their hands and threaten to use it. They don’t need to go out in full view and threaten because relationship is used.

Danger is only the potential for harm. Line of sight, a gun and criminal intent all add up to a potential. This will cause a sudden increase in the targeted person’s metabolism (i.e., fear). This effect is then used. The sudden experience is too rapid to be fully conscious. The person will only be aware of is a sudden increase in their heart rate. This gives a similar effect and thus the illusion of the same reaction in the body as is normally experienced with an acceptance of something. When this illusory effect is made coincident with the ideas /suggestions presented, then it seems as if the person has accepted the ideas in the immediate term, and before they’ve had a chance to think about it. The aim is to deceive the person into believing that they have endorsed the ideas, which means they will treat the ideas as valid and react to the idea. A person who is unaware of this cheat may suffer with increases in cell masses or cancer depending on the suggestions. It is important to read your prayer slowly and consciously to detect such cheats and if it is also illustrated then you can overcome this problem. And again keep the prayer private.

Once you understand this cheat you can use it to detect ideas at an even more subtle mental area. Meditation can be used to watch the ideas arising in mind. If you rest your attention on your breathing you will easily become aware of your heart rate as you notice any ideas that arise in mind. Always remember that the ideas of evil people are baseless, try to remain unmoved by them. Evil people have no rights and no say. Just observe your breathing and heart rate as ideas are presented, and you will see the cheat at a deeper and deeper level. This will help you see that an idea has appeared and there is only a coincident rise in heart rate. The two are separate. It is just ideas and ideas are just like bubbles in soft drink. They pop into existence and rise up to the surface and pop out of existence when you do nothing. If you remain observant then you will detect that the heart rate is fear and not acceptance. It is hard sometimes not to feel angry because the ideas are aimed to be violations but just realize they are null and void and it is an opportunity to treat the evil people as the petty nothings that they are.

The other dangerous idea in the Christian faith as it is proclaimed generally is to “love your enemies”. This is a crippling idea if taken generally. It is vitally important to stand against the enemy if the enemy is evil, even when that enemy is a next of kin! There is no nobility in loving the devil. Indeed with regard to next of kin Jesus had said “I did not come to bring peace but a sword!” A next of kin who is not humane is the enemy of Justice and Truth, the enemy of God. One of the justifications that is used to justify the “love your enemies” saying is that Jesus forgave the Romans, who crucified him. However look more carefully at the text and you will find it was not the Romans that were hell bent on crucifying him, nor the Jewish people but the Jewish High Priests. Pontius Pilate, from what is recorded, couldn’t find any crime and wanted to let him go. I have doubts that the Romans crucified Jesus. We are asked to believe that the Romans crucified Jesus to satisfy the desires of some of their subjects. Romans did not act to please their subjects. They cared nothing about what their subjects wanted. Even if you want to say that Jesus forgave the Romans and the Romans were his enemies, it still does not make the Romans, who crucified him, evil.

I strongly suspect that the statements about loving and forgiving enemies was made general and for political reasons by the Romans themselves to save their Eastern Roman Empire. The “Early Christians”, as church officials insist on calling them, even today, were mainly Greeks with just a sprinkling of Jews among them. And the idea of Jesus being crucified by the Romans was wide spread. The Jewish revolt was crushed but not without the Romans using their elite forces and with a lot of effort. The rest of the Eastern Roman Empire, which was immense, was Greece and predominately what were Greek states that stretched all the way round the Mediterranean to North Africa. If the Greeks revolted then the Romans lose their Eastern Empire. So it is reasonable to consider that Saul, who changed his name to Paul, and who was a Jew born under conditions that gave him Roman citizenship, was selected and used for the job. Saul-Paul was a Roman henchman. It seems reasonable to me that he would be employed by the Roman to convert the Greeks to a tamer form of Christianity.. a corrupted form of Christianity that suited the Romans. The idea that God chose the Roman henchman to convert to a saint to show his power is hypocrisy. God doesn’t need to nor would ever want to “show his power” but the Romans certainly did. The Romans needed to get their man accepted by the Greeks. “Love thy enemies” was none other than “love the Romans” who were tyrannical rulers. By loving the Romans the Greeks were unable to fight them. To love enemies who are toxic and evil is not in the interests of a humane person and Jesus warned people against associating with evil people. Jesus Christ was figuratively described as the “Good Shepard”, not the “Good Husbandry of sheep and wolves”! It is natural and healthy to feel an aversion for toxic/ evil people and wards them off. This is not sin.

“Love your enemies and forgive them” taken generally are corrupt text in the Bible and in any other holy texts as they might appear. You have to weight them against other and more credible verses in the Bible that stands against these ideas. For instance when Jesus went into the temple in Jerusalem and saw the corruption he hardly showed an attitude of “turn the other cheek” or “love your enemies” and “forgive them”. Rather Jesus shouted at them, upturned their tables and whipped some of them as well. If we look at the problem on a large scale we can see the error. Could we have loved the Nazis and forgiven their sins, turned the other cheek and if they were killing Jewish people then handed them over more Jewish people from our own nations and expect to be good doing that? Expect to survived oppression ourselves doing that? Certainly not! The same applies to an individual. A person with cancer is said to have “a battle with cancer”. In fact the battle is with ideas in the mind but their enemies are physical people. The cancer patient is facing enemies who mean to do him or her harm. The cancer “battler” have a right to stand up to his or her enemy and ward them off. Some evil people tried to make a case that if they were counter attacked then the evil people had the right to self defence or that it would make them be able to attack the person even stronger. This is garbage. Evil people are only looking to justify the violence that they want to commit against other people. It needs to be appreciated that evil people are not supported by the Universe and this is where the humane person has the advantage. It is useless to try and find support in social structures because this is ineffective. There are too many toxic people in government departments. Furthermore we have a medical establishment that stand for the aggressors because they see the aggressors as “those people who help create the conditions that bring them lots of profits”. They label the evil people as having a personality disorder and how conveniently they claim there are no treatments for personality disorders. I have heard the aggressors being called “booty” and in some cases from toxic/ evil doctors. Setting up conditions in the Universe, in the Mind (of God) is the powerful means, by which you do win and overcome the problem of cancer, and disease more generally. I can vouch for that. I have reached the stage that even under fierce attack my body continues to be healthy. 

There are similar misleading ideas in Buddhism as well. I have seen plenty of cases where people are encouraged to “sit with the feelings or ideas” or in other words to make the ideas and/or feelings the subject of their meditation. This too is garbage. This is not the same thing as making the mind the object of observation and then watch and noting what ideas arise. And when ideas are noted then dismissed. It is only to recognize what is going on. I’ve known a number of very skilled meditators who have been swiftly and efficiently killed using the method of making the ideas and feeling the subject of meditation. And the offenders are others around them who present themselves as fellow meditators and even seniors and in some cases even teachers.. the “perfected men or women themselves”! I have seen several cases of Buddhist teachers preaching the dharma and professing spiritual enlightenment when from their actions one can see that they have never had an enlightenment experience. Not all the people you meet in religious circles are benevolent. There are many toxic people who join religious communities both in the East and in the West and they parade themselves as good and saintly in order to gain access to easy victims. Your own religious and spiritual experiences, even if very weak, are the best test. Trying to find evidence or considering historical facts can never be the basis of belief. For example you cannot base your faith on whether Noah’s ark existed or not. It should not be a condition of faith if Jesus rose from the dead or not. I do believe resurrection is possible but this is still not enough. It should not matter if Jesus was a historical figure or not. Religious text is often written in parables and historical event are commonly used resourcefully to convey a spiritual message; so religious texts are not reliable historical records. Belief is based on your spiritual experience. The spiritual realm is not dependent on what happens on earth. Rather it is the other way around.

Question everything, every idea, every belief because sometimes even what appears to be reasonable you may later find was not valid. This is critically important because what you uphold to be true is most important as it governs how you act and what happens in your body. Call a spade a spade! There is no other way to think about evil people but as rotting garbage. They are the enemy and they are not sick. They are criminals. They hold evil intent, which is deliberate and deceitful. I will discuss the matter of toxic enemies again because it is critically important for a person to understand what they are up against and how to stand up for themselves and stand against the enemy. The battle is fought and won in the Mind.

In the next post I will discuss the next part of the prayer, which has to do with returning the body to normal function and clearing away the abnormal cell mass.

Problems and dangers of prayer formulation.

Problems and dangers of prayer formulation.

What a prayer is and is not.

 

A prayer is NOT a vow, NOT an offering and NOT a blessing. A blessing is defined as “God’s favour and protection” but the word can also be used to mean “a prayer offered for such favour and protection”. This is however a specific type of prayer which is not for regaining health. A problem with using a blessing is that it can also mean other things such as “a person’s sanction or support”. The word sanction has two opposite meanings so toxic people attempt to distort the meaning in a person’s mind. A sanction may be an official approval for an action but it can also mean the imposition of a penalty. I will discuss the issue of meaning further down because it is a critical issue.

Prayer is best described as a request of God or as a directive to the Universe or the Mind of God. A directive is an authoritative instruction and the only person that has that authority is the patient themselves. A prayer cannot be given by another person unless the patient gives that other person permission. It can be done if you are sure the other person is humane and will act in your best interests. However if you need to give such authority to someone else then it should be limited and conditional upon being beneficial and if not then a serious penalty applies. This helps to make it safe. But it is best to act for yourself.

I prefer to use the words “mental prescription” because it is in the mind and it is a prescription. This means that the word “prescription” can only mean one thing. The only meaning of “prescription” that applies when we talk about mental prescriptions is “an authoritative ruling and the only one with authority is the patient themselves. The reason is that all humane people have absolute authority over their own lives and can exercise free will. This does not apply to inhumane people.

Evil / toxic person have no free will and no autonomy, although many evil people fool themselves into believing they are free individuals. The serious limitation to freedom is by virtue of who they are. Essentially evil people are bound in a single mindset, or what has been loosely named the “evil spirit” or the devil. They have no freedom or independence outside of mob rule. They are not free to do as they like as an individual. All of them live in bondage. None have a free, independent voice. Furthermore they are dispensable as far as the mob is concerned.  All of them are essentially powerless pawns when it comes down to the wire. If the mob wants an evil member dead then they are doomed. And they don’t need to have done anything wrong that would “bring down the wrath of the devil” so to speak. If the game being played suits one of the evil people dead then they are eliminated mercilessly by those that were their toxic friends and fellow members.

The next thing to understand is that they are in essence powerless. My husband was evil and he revealed many, many things about the evil subculture to me in the end in exchange for me not leaving him. It might sound strange that I would stay for such an exchange but my work would not have been possible without what I learnt from him about how evil people operate, who they are and how the foul games are played. One of the things he said that he hated about being evil was that, and to quote his words “without the others doing their bit, one has no power”. He so resented this situation that he admitted he set up every evil person who ever helped him and gained an opportunity to hurt them to make up for his resentment of having to use them to have power.

For all the hate and capacity to be cruel, evil people are very vulnerable by virtue of their actions. They transgress the Laws of the Universe and this has serious consequences. Even in desiring to do evil to others, the evil person has made selections that can be used by the person they target to counter attack the evil people involved. So while they think they are smart and take great pride in being able to band together to play dirty games, take great pleasure in seeing others suffering and see their hate as booty, in reality they are pawns on a board, powerless shit and with nothing to look forward to but eternal damnation because by their actions they become spiritually dead. Some deceive themselves that if they take Christ as their saviour in their last breath then they will be saved. This really highlights one of the fallacies of the “apostle” Paul’s teaching because Jesu’s message was completely different. The “apostle” Paul claimed it didn’t matter who you are or what you’ve done and you don’t have to be good. All you got to do is believe Jesus is God and your home free! If it were true then it opens the door to evil to do evil all their lives and go to heaven just the same.

Danger and difficulties to be aware of in formulating a prayer

and how to overcome such difficulties.

A cure is brought about by addressing the source of the problem and returning the body to health. The problem and the solution involve both ideas and emotions. Firstly you need to identify the negative ideas, especially those you uphold with confidence because it is these ideas that move the body to give rise to emotions AND to develop cell masses. Appreciate that the emotions that appear associated are really only coincidental. As I explained earlier it is just a part of the cheat. So for instance a person will perceive the danger posed by a criminal who sits in his car down the street, if they have been relationally entangled with the criminal previously, AND if they have been given a copy of the key to that person’s front door. And perceiving the danger they will feel fear. The idea that “the food they just ate has additives and they are toxins that cause cancer” is only a coincident idea. Not knowing the cheats it appears reasonable to believe the idea because there is what appears to be associated fear!

I have seen some “new age doctors” call the emotional reactivity as “emotional toxicity” but this too is wrong thinking. They know that the patient needs to get rid of the emotions to help clear away the cancer but they don’t want to say just that because it contradicts evolutionary biology and the claim that we are just machines, i.e., robots. If we were not machines we might be able to make ourselves well! “Perish the thought”, they privately say, “it’s bad for business!” The problem with calling the emotions emotional toxicity doesn’t give the emotions legitimacy and without understanding how they justifiably arise you can’t make them go away. You can’t clean away emotions as you might do toxins.

What we could call the emotional reactivity is “emotional bleeding”. The victim is essentially emotionally bled because issues are continually presented to the person in mind. Some of those issues may be real, as for example someone may act unjustly towards you to anger you. Other issues may only be threats, as for example a criminal with a key thinking about using it. Issues give rise to a need to do something and that need causes the person to react somatically. The emotion is a somatic reaction. For example fear is the mobilization of the body for possible action. Anger is the energizing of the body for more emphatic expression. And it is no use saying the person’s a fool because the emotions are natural processes in the body. The only way to overcome the problem is to deal with the issues. You may need to confront people who are offending against you to resolve some issues. But in the main it is to realize that most of the issues are threatened. Some of the emotional reactivity is aimed at creating activity in various organs in the body and some to try and sell suggestions as beliefs. The only emotion you can’t easily clear is fear but fear on its own is only a mobilization of the body and nothing more. So your metabolism is running a bit higher than normal, so what! Knowing the fear is caused from a threat that is not aimed to be carried out will lessen the fear considerably and it is possible for you to even eliminate it completely.

The other critical aspect is recognition that the ideas are mere suggestions. This is where medical misinformation plays a big role to disadvantage people. When they are not dreaming up chemical imbalances psychiatrists conjecture problematic ideas are the culprits. Conjecture is about drawing conclusions from incomplete information. Of course it is incomplete when they refuse to consider the big picture.

The conjecture is that the problematic ideas arise “out of the depth of your subconscious” as there is some “inner conflict” because “different parts of your personality at war with one another”. And even worse that all this “shit” was “downloaded” before you were five years old! What more disempowering could they say? They look to put themselves in the driver’s seat where your health is concerned. All of this reasoning is baseless garbage. There is NO scientific basis for it. And the science that is done is skewed towards getting the result that suits the sale of drugs and medical procedures.

Psychiatric opinions disempower people and render them vulnerable to attack. If a person believes that the ideas are their own and can’t see how or why they have such ideas or believe the medical opinions, then they are stuck in a maze. If they uphold the ideas with confidence the problem is worse. The way out is to discharge the ideas or at least recognize that while they may repeatedly arise they are rubbish. The evil people’s ideas are nonsense, garbage. Doctors publicly reject the reality that ideas affect the body. Even where the idea of danger is concerned they still looked for linked series of causes that go from the brain to the body; Hence the reason for describing thinking as a part of “brain circuitry”. You need to realize that many ideas are mere perceptions. If you look out of your window and see the road you can’t say that you’re personally responsible for creating the idea of the road in mind. The idea of the road is a perception that arises naturally because your eyes send the information they have received to your brain to help bring that perception into being in the mind. In cancer, as in many other diseases, the ideas are perceptions. The only difference is that while the idea of the road outside the window is perceived in the mind after information is gathered through sensory mean, the ideas that are presented or addressed to a person by closely related people are perceived directly in the mind. We have the capacity of direct mental perception or what science calls extrasensory perception (ESP). BUT all ESP research is done WITHOUT relationship so only the weakest possible amount is seen. ESP is the means by which ideas can be craftily presented and used as weapons but the person targeted must be ignorant of the truth. When a person realizes that the ideas are just a bunch of garbage then they remain unmoved by them, which means their body remains at rest. Just knowing the foul play enables the person to distrust and hence discredit the ideas. They may feel the fear but they know the fear has nothing to do with the ideas, so the ideas lose their power.

A cancer patient who rejects the presented ideas, realizing that even thought they are cunningly made and may even appear as the own ideas or reasoning never the less they are rubbish. Such presentations are episodic because evil people gather to use criminals and make the suggestions. And they look to anchor the ideas with real events but of course once again the person only needs to realize that those events are unrelated. Toxic people may create events to suit but mostly they use events that are happening as part of every day life. So for instance if they need to do some building or renovations they may have some worker arrive to do the work in a motor vehicle with a company logo or the words builder or carpenter etc., or with ladders and other obvious equipment on the back of a truck into visibility of the cancer patient. Just recognize that an army of builder or carpenters or whatever they are have absolutely nothing to do with building cell masses! So recognize that the ideas of “it’s getting built” or “it’s getting fixed” etc., are general. Make them specific. Some toxic neighbour’s house or kitchen or their “crap in” hole is getting fixed. So even where the attacks are repeatedly made using nasty ideas as weapons and toxic rubbish parade events as a showcase, there are no “bad days”.

It is most important to appreciate that the enemy has attempted to set up a theatre of war in the mind. But once you appreciate that the waring parties are toxic people related to you and that their just rubbish suggestions you can laugh in their faces. Just realize that ideas are not in business for themselves. They cannot repeatedly come to mind of their own accord. No ideas arise spontaneously and persistently out of the person’s subconscious or unconscious, much less from the past. Issues form the past can only trouble a person in the present if the toxic people who created those issues or other toxic people who have gained knowledge of the issues, are presenting ideas in mind in the present. This is the only way that issues of the past can trouble a person in the present. There has to be toxic people and foul game play involved but the whole thing can be wiped away as easily as a spider’s web can be wiped away with a stick.  

Address the ideas that are used, which are drawn out of the media. There is also a worldwide medical and media campaign that I believe is maliciously aimed to deceive people and help evil people use negative ideas. There is a lot of talk about toxins in the environment and toxins in our food and toxins in the products we use etc., and that these toxins cause cancer. All of it is false but such ideas help evil people present negative ideas that seem reasonable if the person has heard them on the news or seen some article in a magazine or on the internet. We see lawsuits where parties fight it out in court but are they real or is it just theatre? Well you might say a few million dollars in damages sometimes change hands. Yes but a few million dollars are as a drop in the Pacific Ocean when there are trillions of dollars made from disease. Toxins, if they are ingested may cause damage but they cannot modify the genetic expression of a cell as to give them new properties. Only your body’s defence system can do that but it can only be done when you perceive a particular type of threat. The damage that toxins create is cleaned up by the body. But if a person can be led to believe that there are toxins in their food or in the things they handle or in their environment and that they cause cancer, then it is an easy next step for the toxic rubbish to lead that person to believe that some part of their body might be under threat, by adding fear.

A simple affirmation that the ideas are garbage and of zero significance and that the emotions that seem to be associated with them are unrelated and only coincidental is the first part of prayer. Evil people will fight to try and push the ideas in more devious ways so you need to be aware of the menacing ways in which ideas may be presented as to distort meaning. So in the next post I will briefly discuss the ways, by which meaning can be affected but again you only need to be aware in order to overcome the problem and formulate a prayer for healing.

 January, 15^th 2014.

Kyrani Eade BSc.

Kyrani99